Stefan Uppenkamp
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Speech and Hearing top 1%
- Signal Processing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Roy D. PattersonTimothy D. GriffithsIngrid S. JohnsrudeBirger KollmeierAlexander GutschalkAndré RuppMichael SchergManfred Mauermann
- Topics
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (38 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (34 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNeuronSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Stefan Uppenkamp
52 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 500
- Sensory Systems 407
- Speech and Hearing 241
- Signal Processing 230
Countries citing papers authored by Stefan Uppenkamp
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan Uppenkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan Uppenkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan Uppenkamp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stefan Uppenkamp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan Uppenkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan Uppenkamp. The network helps show where Stefan Uppenkamp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefan Uppenkamp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefan Uppenkamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefan Uppenkamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stefan Uppenkamp. Stefan Uppenkamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 140 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | The Processing of Temporal Pitch and Melody Information in Auditory Cortexbreakdown → | 546 |
| 17 | 166 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Stefan Uppenkamp
Stefan Uppenkamp is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Speech and Hearing, having authored 54 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (38 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (34 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Sensory Systems (407 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (500 citations). Stefan Uppenkamp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Roy D. Patterson, Timothy D. Griffiths, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Birger Kollmeier, Alexander Gutschalk, André Rupp, Michael Scherg, Manfred Mauermann, Oliver Josephs and Jason D. Warren. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.