Stanley Chodorow

614 citations
15 papers · 213 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • History top 5%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

Stanley Chodorow

13 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers

Stanley Chodorow
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Classics 39
  • History 47
  • General Dentistry 6
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
  • Religious studies 11
Replace Penny Schine Gold with:
Penny Schine Gold United States
Constance Jordan United States
Lorna Duffin New Zealand
María Antonia Álvarez Colombia
George Weigel United States
Roy Porter
Emma Smith United Kingdom
Antoon de Baets Netherlands
Deborah Gorham Canada
Martín Rhonheimer United States
Stanley Chodorow relative to Penny Schine Gold United States Penny Schine Gold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Penny Schine Gold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stanley Chodorow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stanley Chodorow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stanley Chodorow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanley Chodorow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stanley Chodorow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stanley Chodorow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stanley Chodorow. The network helps show where Stanley Chodorow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Stanley Chodorow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stanley Chodorow Line = papers co-authored together Stanley Chodorow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199687
2 199452
3 199016
4 197216
5 197513
6
Scholarship and Scholarly Communication in the Electronic Age.
20006
7 19985
8 20065
9 19964
10
Decretales ineditae saeculi XII : from the papers of the late Walther Holtzmann
19823
11 19713
12
Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law : San Diego, University of California at La Jolla, 21-27 August 1988
19921
13 19701
14
A history of the world
19861
15 20230

About Stanley Chodorow

Stanley Chodorow is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Classics, Information Systems and Conservation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 213 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (3 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (3 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (1 paper), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (39 citations), History (47 citations), General Dentistry (6 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations) and Religious studies (11 citations). Stanley Chodorow has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Pennington, Richard Kay, James R. Sweeney, Albert J. Schmidt, Charles Duggan and Walther Holtzmann. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Legal History, Traditio, Speculum, The American Historical Review and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact