Stacy H. Teng

664 citations
16 papers · 348 indexed · h-index 11
Topics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (13 papers)Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (9 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (6 papers)
Journals
The Astrophysical JournalSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

In The Last Decade

Stacy H. Teng

16 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers

Stacy H. Teng
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 322
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 107
  • Instrumentation 41
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 31
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 7
Replace Nathan Golovich with:
Nathan Golovich United States
Lihwai Lin United States
Genoveva Micheva Germany
Todd Hurt United States
Aycin Aykutalp United States
K. Hryniewicz Poland
K. Chang Germany
F. Kenn Netherlands
L. Alegre United Kingdom
Pavel Jáchym Czechia
Stacy H. Teng relative to Nathan Golovich United States Nathan Golovich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nathan Golovich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacy H. Teng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy H. Teng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy H. Teng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy H. Teng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy H. Teng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy H. Teng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy H. Teng. The network helps show where Stacy H. Teng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacy H. Teng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacy H. Teng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacy H. Teng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacy H. Teng. Stacy H. Teng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 8
3 12
4 27
5 44
6 15
7 18
8 26
9 16
10 39
11 33
12 9
13 42
14 38
15 6
16 8

About Stacy H. Teng

Stacy H. Teng is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (13 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (9 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (322 citations), Instrumentation (41 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (107 citations). Stacy H. Teng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sylvain Veilleux, S. G. Neff, J. S. Ulvestad, D. B. Sanders, A. S. Wilson, Neil M. Nagar, A. J. Young, David S. N. Rupke, C. S. Reynolds and A. J. Baker. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026