Stacie Kroboth
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Surgery
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Jonathan C. MakielskiDavid J. TesterNian‐Qing ShiMichael J. AckermanBi-Hua TanArgelia Medeiros‐DomingoDeepika RajeshAmanda A. Mack
- Topics
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (7 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (5 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American College of CardiologyPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaItaly
In The Last Decade
Stacie Kroboth
20 papers receiving 661 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 420
- Molecular Biology 403
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 100
- Surgery 65
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 62
Countries citing papers authored by Stacie Kroboth
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacie Kroboth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacie Kroboth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacie Kroboth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacie Kroboth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacie Kroboth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacie Kroboth. The network helps show where Stacie Kroboth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacie Kroboth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacie Kroboth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacie Kroboth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacie Kroboth. Stacie Kroboth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 75 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 190 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Stacie Kroboth
Stacie Kroboth is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (7 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (5 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (420 citations), Molecular Biology (403 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (23 citations). Stacie Kroboth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan C. Makielski, David J. Tester, Nian‐Qing Shi, Michael J. Ackerman, Bi-Hua Tan, Argelia Medeiros‐Domingo, Deepika Rajesh, Amanda A. Mack, Lia Crotti and Chunhua Song. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.