S.M. Thompson

1.3k total citations
50 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

S.M. Thompson is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, S.M. Thompson has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 18 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 15 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in S.M. Thompson's work include Magnetic properties of thin films (30 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (15 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (13 papers). S.M. Thompson is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic properties of thin films (30 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (15 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (13 papers). S.M. Thompson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. S.M. Thompson's co-authors include B. K. Tanner, J. F. Gregg, K. Ounadjela, J. M. D. Coey, M. Hehn, M. Viret, W. Allen, J.A.D. Matthew, Bernard Gilmartin and R. Edward Hogan and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

S.M. Thompson

49 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S.M. Thompson United Kingdom 18 625 459 277 262 227 50 1.1k
T. Yokoyama Japan 21 377 0.6× 289 0.6× 427 1.5× 362 1.4× 22 0.1× 49 1.3k
Peter Sandvik United States 17 126 0.2× 276 0.6× 296 1.1× 618 2.4× 77 0.3× 42 1.4k
James R. Cullen United States 16 407 0.7× 496 1.1× 309 1.1× 285 1.1× 163 0.7× 31 942
W. Sträub Germany 13 123 0.2× 76 0.2× 57 0.2× 357 1.4× 62 0.3× 70 673
Suvadip Das United States 12 506 0.8× 255 0.6× 238 0.9× 464 1.8× 80 0.4× 22 1.1k
Keita Takahashi Japan 17 79 0.1× 381 0.8× 405 1.5× 167 0.6× 36 0.2× 47 1.0k
P. J. Burnett United Kingdom 21 218 0.3× 124 0.3× 86 0.3× 1.3k 4.9× 552 2.4× 34 2.5k
Zhipeng Gao China 25 68 0.1× 698 1.5× 49 0.2× 1.5k 5.6× 452 2.0× 116 2.1k
G. Rivero Spain 16 399 0.6× 393 0.9× 60 0.2× 278 1.1× 380 1.7× 47 936
K. P. Mohanchandra United States 20 196 0.3× 557 1.2× 66 0.2× 798 3.0× 146 0.6× 62 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by S.M. Thompson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.M. Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.M. Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.M. Thompson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.M. Thompson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.M. Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.M. Thompson. The network helps show where S.M. Thompson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S.M. Thompson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S.M. Thompson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S.M. Thompson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S.M. Thompson. S.M. Thompson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thompson, S.M., et al.. (2024). Analysis of ERAS protocol adherence and postoperative outcomes after major colorectal surgery in a community hospital. The American Journal of Surgery. 239. 116022–116022.
2.
Thompson, S.M., Sebastian Fung, & David G. Wood. (2016). The prevalence of proximal hamstring pathology on MRI in the asymptomatic population. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 25(1). 108–111. 11 indexed citations
3.
Thompson, S.M., et al.. (2015). Finite element analysis: a comparison of an all-polyethylene tibial implant and its metal-backed equivalent. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 24(8). 2560–2566. 22 indexed citations
4.
Thompson, S.M., Vlado K. Lazarov, B. Kaeswurm, et al.. (2010). Using the infrared magnetorefractive effect to compare the magnetoresistance in (100) and (111) oriented Fe3O4 films. Journal of Applied Physics. 107(9). 9 indexed citations
5.
Thompson, S.M., et al.. (2008). Investigation and treatment for isolated vastus intermedius rupture. Injury Extra. 39(6). 232–234. 3 indexed citations
6.
Fairchild, Brian D., Paige Lacy, John W. Worley, et al.. (2006). Fine Particle Measurements Inside and Outside Tunnel-Ventilated Broiler Houses. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 15(3). 394–405. 9 indexed citations
7.
Dennis, Cindi L., C. Tiuşan, J. F. Gregg, G J Ensell, & S.M. Thompson. (2005). Silicon spin diffusion transistor: materials, physics and device characteristics. IEE Proceedings - Circuits Devices and Systems. 152(4). 340–340. 6 indexed citations
8.
Kravets, A. F., et al.. (2005). Modelling the magnetorefractive effect in giant magnetoresistive granular and layered materials. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 303(1). 92–110. 29 indexed citations
9.
Vopsaroiu, M., et al.. (2004). Contactless magnetoresistance studies ofCoCumultilayers using the infrared magnetorefractive effect. Physical Review B. 70(21). 32 indexed citations
10.
Willems, Patrick, Luis Timbe, S.M. Thompson, et al.. (2003). FAME: Flood risk and damage assessment using modelling and earth observation techniques. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 3 indexed citations
11.
Gregg, J. F., W. Allen, K. Ounadjela, et al.. (1996). Giant Magnetoresistive Effects in a Single Element Magnetic Thin Film. Physical Review Letters. 77(8). 1580–1583. 244 indexed citations
12.
Azizi, A., et al.. (1996). Structural characterization of epitaxial Co–Ag. Journal of Applied Physics. 79(8). 6247–6249. 2 indexed citations
13.
Thompson, S.M., et al.. (1995). Bilateral simultaneous trabeculectomy. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 73(6). 543–546. 1 indexed citations
14.
Watts, R. K., et al.. (1995). Experimental and theoretical studies of permalloy-copper alloy bilayers by spin wave resonance. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 140-144. 599–600. 2 indexed citations
15.
Thompson, S.M., J. F. Gregg, K. Ounadjela, et al.. (1993). Giant magnetoresistance of cobalt-silver metastable alloys prepared by sputtering and mechanical alloying. Philosophical Magazine B. 68(6). 923–937. 24 indexed citations
16.
Watson, M., et al.. (1992). Studies of the effect of interfacial interdiffusion on the coupling of NiFe films through a chromium interfilm. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 113(1-3). 97–104. 4 indexed citations
17.
Thompson, S.M., et al.. (1989). Clinical indications for intraocular lens power calculation: A prospective randomised study. Eye. 3(6). 696–703. 3 indexed citations
18.
Drake, John B., et al.. (1988). Molecular dynamics of a model polymer on a hypercube parallel computer. Computers & Chemistry. 12(1). 15–20. 4 indexed citations
19.
Thompson, S.M., et al.. (1987). Ocular signs in Alport's syndrome. Eye. 1(1). 146–153. 33 indexed citations
20.
Thompson, S.M., et al.. (1986). A comparison of postoperative refractive results with and without intraocular lens power calculation.. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 70(1). 22–25. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026