Sjoerd van Bree
About
In The Last Decade
Sjoerd van Bree
7 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Surgery 160
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 82
- Gastroenterology 52
- Oncology 45
- Physiology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Sjoerd van Bree
This map shows the geographic impact of Sjoerd van Bree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sjoerd van Bree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sjoerd van Bree more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sjoerd van Bree
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sjoerd van Bree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sjoerd van Bree. The network helps show where Sjoerd van Bree may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sjoerd van Bree
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sjoerd van Bree. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sjoerd van Bree based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sjoerd van Bree. Sjoerd van Bree is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 117 | |
| 3 | 92 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.