Simon Waldbaum

883 citations
8 papers · 731 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Waldbaum

8 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

Simon Waldbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 341
  • Clinical Biochemistry 106
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 163
  • Biochemistry 69
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 64
Replace Natália Gindri Fiorenza with:
Natália Gindri Fiorenza Brazil
Shane Rowley United States
Antonio Mendonça Canada
Liliana Carmona‐Aparicio Mexico
Song Xu China
Philip E. Chen United Kingdom
Liga Zvejniece Latvia
Torun M. Melø Norway
Otoni Cardoso do Vale Brazil
Tawfeeq Shekh‐Ahmad Israel
Simon Waldbaum relative to Natália Gindri Fiorenza Brazil Natália Gindri Fiorenza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Natália Gindri Fiorenza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Waldbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Waldbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Waldbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Waldbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Waldbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Waldbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Waldbaum. The network helps show where Simon Waldbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Simon Waldbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Waldbaum Line = papers co-authored together Simon Waldbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2009277
2 2010206
3 201179
4 201079
5 200041
6 200122
7 200814
8 200013

About Simon Waldbaum

Simon Waldbaum is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (341 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (106 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (163 citations), Biochemistry (69 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (64 citations). Simon Waldbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Manisha Patel, Liping Liang, Musa A. Haxhiu, Ting‐Ting Huang, Brian J. Day, Shane Rowley, Paul Ernsberger, Ismail A Dreshaj, F. Edward Dudek and S. I. A. Zaidi. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Epilepsy Research, Brain Research, Journal of Applied Physiology and Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact