Philip E. Chen

1.7k citations
23 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Philip E. Chen

23 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Philip E. Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 909
  • Clinical Biochemistry 132
  • Developmental Neuroscience 71
  • Biological Psychiatry 28
  • Molecular Biology 765
Replace A. Cupello with:
A. Cupello Italy
Elena Bogónez Spain
Orlando Ghirardi Italy
Vladimı́r Doležal Czechia
B. I. Khodorov Russia
Marcos Emílio Frizzo Brazil
Tao Su China
M. Flint Beal United States
Toshifumi Yamamoto Japan
Jan N. Johannessen United States
Philip E. Chen relative to A. Cupello Italy A. Cupello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
A. Cupello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Chen. The network helps show where Philip E. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. Chen Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015184
2 1998154
3 2004141
4 2007131
5 2005123
6 2012111
7 2006111
8 200776
9 200670
10 200643
11 200738
12 200236
13 201829
14 200321
15 200920
16 200615
17 200414
18 200614
19 200710
20 201310

About Philip E. Chen

Philip E. Chen is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Developmental Neuroscience and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (909 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (132 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (71 citations), Biological Psychiatry (28 citations) and Molecular Biology (765 citations). Philip E. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David J. A. Wyllie, Stephen F. Traynelis, Kevin Erreger, Ralf Schoepfer, Robin S. B. Williams, Matthew C. Walker, Pishan Chang, David Colquhoun, Matthew T. Geballe and James P. Snyder. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Molecular Pharmacology, Journal of Neuroscience, Human Molecular Genetics and Brain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact