Epilepsy Research

5.0k papers and 142.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.0k papers published in Epilepsy Research in the last decades have received a total of 142.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Epilepsy Research usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (3.3k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.3k papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Epilepsy research and treatment (3.3k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2.1k papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Epilepsy Research are Wolfgang Löscher, Dieter Schmidt, Michael A. Rogawski, Emilio Perucca, Martin J. Brodie, Jerome Engel, H. Steve White, Brian S. Meldrum, Torbjörn Tomson and Ésper A. Cavalheiro.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Epilepsy Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Epilepsy Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Epilepsy Research.

Countries where authors publish in Epilepsy Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Epilepsy Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Epilepsy Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Epilepsy Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025