Simon Pemberton

608 citations
38 papers · 417 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Pemberton

37 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Simon Pemberton
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Urban Studies 56
  • Public Administration 26
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45
  • General Health Professions 104
  • Demography 53
Replace Eleanor Jupp with:
Eleanor Jupp United Kingdom
Sharon R. Roseman Canada
Aneta Piekut United Kingdom
Gwen van Eijk Netherlands
Katharine Mumford United Kingdom
Virgílio Borges Pereira Portugal
Sarah A. Blue United States
Leanne Wood Australia
Karin Schwiter Switzerland
Dušan Drbohlav Czechia
Simon Pemberton relative to Eleanor Jupp United Kingdom Eleanor Jupp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eleanor Jupp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Pemberton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Pemberton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Pemberton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Pemberton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Pemberton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Pemberton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Pemberton. The network helps show where Simon Pemberton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Simon Pemberton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Pemberton Line = papers co-authored together Simon Pemberton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201662
2 201851
3 201329
4 201522
5 201822
6 202118
7 200816
8 201815
9 201515
10 202115
11 202314
12 201512
13 201911
14 202111
15 201710
16 20199
17 20087
18 20086
19 20116
20 20156

About Simon Pemberton

Simon Pemberton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 38 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rural development and sustainability (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (56 citations), Public Administration (26 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (45 citations), General Health Professions (104 citations) and Demography (53 citations). Simon Pemberton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jenny Phillimore, Hannah Bradby, Beatriz Padilla, Eldin Fahmy, Glen Searle, Jennifer Mason, Eileen Sutton, Tilman Brand, Richard I. Waller and Greg Lloyd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Rural Studies, Urban Studies, Social Policy and Society, European Planning Studies and Policy & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact