This map shows the geographic impact of Signe Arnfred's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Signe Arnfred with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Signe Arnfred more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Signe Arnfred. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Signe Arnfred. The network helps show where Signe Arnfred may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Signe Arnfred
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Signe Arnfred.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Signe Arnfred based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Signe Arnfred. Signe Arnfred is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Arnfred, Signe. (2010). Feminism and gendered bodies: on female initiation rituals in Northern Mozambique. RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya). 61–82.
9.
Arnfred, Signe, et al.. (2009). Introduction: Sex & Politics—Case Africa. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research. 17(3). 149–157.4 indexed citations
10.
Arnfred, Signe. (2009). African Feminists on Sexualities. Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines. 43(1). 151–159.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.