Signe Abitz Winther
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Nephrology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter RossingNete TofteTine W. HansenTarunveer S. AhluwaliaSimone TheiladeBernt Johan von ScholtenMarie Frimodt‐MøllerJens Oellgaard
- Topics
- Diabetes Management and Research (8 papers)Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers)Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEDiabetes CareDiabetes
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Signe Abitz Winther
31 papers receiving 772 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Molecular Biology 301
- Physiology 232
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 173
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 151
- Nephrology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Signe Abitz Winther
This map shows the geographic impact of Signe Abitz Winther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Signe Abitz Winther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Signe Abitz Winther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Signe Abitz Winther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Signe Abitz Winther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Signe Abitz Winther. The network helps show where Signe Abitz Winther may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Signe Abitz Winther
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Signe Abitz Winther. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Signe Abitz Winther based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Signe Abitz Winther. Signe Abitz Winther is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 104 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Signe Abitz Winther
Signe Abitz Winther is a scholar working on Nephrology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 778 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (8 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (132 citations), Biological Psychiatry (32 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (173 citations). Signe Abitz Winther has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Rossing, Nete Tofte, Tine W. Hansen, Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia, Simone Theilade, Bernt Johan von Scholten, Marie Frimodt‐Møller, Jens Oellgaard, Tommi Suvitaival and Oluf Pedersen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Diabetes Care and Diabetes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.