Siegel

497 total citations
12 papers, 392 citations indexed

About

Siegel is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Siegel has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 392 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Environmental Engineering, 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 1 paper in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Siegel's work include Groundwater flow and contamination studies (4 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (3 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper). Siegel is often cited by papers focused on Groundwater flow and contamination studies (4 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (3 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper). Siegel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Siegel's co-authors include James O. Leckie, Douglas B. Kent, V. S. Tripathi, F. Schmidt, Ian D.R. Mackinnon, S.L. Phillips, A. J. Brearley, Walton R. Kelly, Чи and Walter Beyeler and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecular Pharmacology, European Journal of Clinical Investigation and Nurse Education Today.

In The Last Decade

Siegel

10 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Siegel United States 4 264 57 49 46 38 12 392
Shirley A. Hilden United States 12 343 1.3× 45 0.8× 85 1.7× 48 1.0× 51 1.3× 18 487
Florian Lang Germany 10 321 1.2× 74 1.3× 55 1.1× 20 0.4× 39 1.0× 11 484
Wu-Hsiung Huang United States 13 441 1.7× 53 0.9× 54 1.1× 57 1.2× 39 1.0× 24 604
Tadashi Kashiwagura Japan 11 180 0.7× 60 1.1× 58 1.2× 27 0.6× 35 0.9× 22 396
L. Cheng United States 9 276 1.0× 38 0.7× 46 0.9× 24 0.5× 25 0.7× 14 404
Marcia Steinberg United States 11 275 1.0× 30 0.5× 19 0.4× 30 0.7× 49 1.3× 17 362
S.N. Orlov Russia 11 270 1.0× 27 0.5× 119 2.4× 41 0.9× 69 1.8× 34 472
Y. Tashima Japan 8 436 1.7× 51 0.9× 41 0.8× 69 1.5× 36 0.9× 9 543
M. Beltrame Italy 7 283 1.1× 126 2.2× 43 0.9× 39 0.8× 12 0.3× 10 660
F.M.A.H. Schuurmans Stekhoven Netherlands 17 612 2.3× 47 0.8× 58 1.2× 63 1.4× 74 1.9× 38 806

Countries citing papers authored by Siegel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Siegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Siegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Siegel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Siegel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Siegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Siegel. The network helps show where Siegel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Siegel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Siegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Siegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Siegel. Siegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Siegel. (2009). Response. Victorian Studies. 51(3). 496–496.
2.
Siegel, et al.. (1999). Comparison of the effect of native glucagon‐like peptide 1 and dipeptidyl peptidase IV‐resistant analogues on insulin release from rat pancreatic islets. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 29(7). 610–614. 24 indexed citations
3.
Shim, Jae K., Siegel, & Чи. (1997). The Vest Pocket Guide to Information Technology. 1 indexed citations
5.
Brearley, A. J., et al.. (1992). Nature and genesis of clay minerals of the Rustler Formation in the vicinity of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in Souteastern New Mexico. 3 indexed citations
6.
Shephard, Les E., Robert J. Glass, Siegel, & Vincent Tidwell. (1990). An experimental program for testing the validity of flow and transport models in unsaturated tuff: The Yucca Mountain Project. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
7.
Siegel, et al.. (1990). Studies of radionuclide sorption by clays in the Culebra dolomite at the WIPP site, southeastern New Mexico. 1 indexed citations
8.
Siegel, S.L. Phillips, James O. Leckie, & Walton R. Kelly. (1988). Development of a methodology of geochemical sensitivity analysis for performance assessment. Nurse Education Today. 50. 189–211. 2 indexed citations
9.
Kent, Douglas B., et al.. (1988). Surface-complexation modeling of radionuclide adsorption in subsurface environments. 40 indexed citations
10.
Siegel, et al.. (1986). Approximate methods to calculate radionuclide discharges for performance assessment of HLW repositories in fractured rock. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
11.
Siegel, et al.. (1984). Radionuclide releases from a hypothetical nuclear waste repository: potential violations of the proposed EPA standard by radionuclides with multiple aqueous species. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
12.
Siegel, et al.. (1968). Studies on the Interaction of Ouabain and Other Cardioactive Steroids with Sodium-Potassium-Activated Adenosine Triphosphatase. Molecular Pharmacology. 4(4). 324–336. 317 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026