Sharon Nofech‐Mozes
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Oncology top 2%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Wedad HannaNadia IsmiilEileen RakovitchZeina GhorabMahmoud A. KhalifaAnne L. MartelSteven A. NarodJohn M.S. Bartlett
- Topics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (55 papers)Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (33 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (31 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesEgypt
In The Last Decade
Sharon Nofech‐Mozes
147 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Cancer Research 1.2k
- Oncology 1.1k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 656
- Reproductive Medicine 637
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 614
Countries citing papers authored by Sharon Nofech‐Mozes
This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon Nofech‐Mozes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon Nofech‐Mozes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon Nofech‐Mozes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sharon Nofech‐Mozes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon Nofech‐Mozes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon Nofech‐Mozes. The network helps show where Sharon Nofech‐Mozes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sharon Nofech‐Mozes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sharon Nofech‐Mozes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sharon Nofech‐Mozes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sharon Nofech‐Mozes. Sharon Nofech‐Mozes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 84 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Sharon Nofech‐Mozes
Sharon Nofech‐Mozes is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 152 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (55 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (33 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (656 citations), Cancer Research (1.2k citations) and Reproductive Medicine (637 citations). Sharon Nofech‐Mozes has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Wedad Hanna, Nadia Ismiil, Eileen Rakovitch, Zeina Ghorab, Mahmoud A. Khalifa, Anne L. Martel, Steven A. Narod, John M.S. Bartlett, Jane Bayani and Joema Felipe Lima. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.