Frances C. Wright

9.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
234 papers, 5.0k citations indexed

About

Frances C. Wright is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Frances C. Wright has authored 234 papers receiving a total of 5.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 115 papers in Oncology, 56 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 42 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Frances C. Wright's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (43 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (40 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (24 papers). Frances C. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (43 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (40 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (24 papers). Frances C. Wright collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frances C. Wright's co-authors include Anna R. Gagliardi, Nicole J. Look Hong, Calvin Law, David R. McCready, Amber Hunter, Andrew J. Smith, Gregory J. Czarnota, B Langer, Christopher Vito and Ali Sadeghi‐Naini and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Frances C. Wright

221 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Sentinel Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Biopsy-Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The SN FNAC Study

2014 555 citations Angel Arnaout, David R. McCready et al. profile →
Surgeon Sex and Long-Term Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Common Surgeries

2023 95 citations Natalie G. Coburn, Frances C. Wright et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Frances C. Wright Canada	35	2.1k	1.3k	1.2k	940	916	234	5.0k
Donald R. Lannin United States	34	2.7k 1.3×	2.1k 1.5×	939 0.8×	359 0.4×	1.3k 1.4×	112	5.1k
Karen E. Hoffman United States	35	1.9k 0.9×	1.3k 1.0×	1.1k 0.9×	650 0.7×	715 0.8×	107	4.7k
Matt Hayat United States	5	3.3k 1.6×	956 0.7×	1.2k 1.0×	462 0.5×	734 0.8×	6	7.9k
Marie‐Josèphe Horner United States	11	3.6k 1.7×	993 0.7×	1.3k 1.1×	445 0.5×	833 0.9×	26	8.2k
Martin Krapcho United States	10	3.6k 1.7×	1.0k 0.8×	1.3k 1.1×	462 0.5×	747 0.8×	14	8.2k
William J. Mackillop Canada	46	2.8k 1.3×	1.0k 0.8×	1.8k 1.6×	1.3k 1.4×	453 0.5×	151	7.2k
Ann B. Nattinger United States	43	2.7k 1.3×	1.2k 0.9×	1.2k 1.0×	218 0.2×	549 0.6×	146	6.1k
Julie A. Margenthaler United States	41	1.8k 0.9×	2.4k 1.8×	1.7k 1.4×	730 0.8×	1.2k 1.3×	203	5.5k
Xianglin L. Du United States	46	4.0k 1.9×	1.0k 0.8×	817 0.7×	329 0.3×	963 1.1×	216	7.4k
Marieke W.J. Louwman Netherlands	40	3.1k 1.5×	1.2k 0.9×	901 0.8×	413 0.4×	884 1.0×	145	5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Frances C. Wright

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frances C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances C. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frances C. Wright

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances C. Wright. The network helps show where Frances C. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frances C. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frances C. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frances C. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frances C. Wright. Frances C. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Moore-Palhares, Daniel, Lakshmanan Sannachi, Adrian Wai Chan, et al.. (2025). Validation of a Quantitative Ultrasound Texture Analysis Model for Early Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Serial Imaging Study. Cancers. 17(15). 2594–2594.

Yao, Xiaomei, Tara Baetz, Alexandra Easson, et al.. (2024). Surveillance evaluations in patients with stage I, II, III, or resectable IV melanoma who were treated with curative intent: A systematic review. Surgical Oncology. 54. 102077–102077. 3 indexed citations

Chan, An‐Wen, Timothy P. Hanna, James J. Limacher, et al.. (2023). Incidence, mortality and survival of Merkel cell carcinoma: a systematic review of population-based studies. British Journal of Dermatology. 190(6). 811–824. 19 indexed citations

Saadat, Lily V., Elizabeth Schofield, Michael Curry, et al.. (2023). Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Ontario and the USA. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 31(1). 58–65. 4 indexed citations

Tan, Vivian, Michael C. Tjong, Wing C. Chan, et al.. (2023). Pain and Interventions in Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Province-Wide Analysis. Current Oncology. 30(3). 3461–3472. 4 indexed citations

Wright, Frances C., et al.. (2023). Refining the thoracic surgical oncology regionalization standards for esophageal surgery in Ontario, Canada: Moving from good to better. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 166(6). 1502–1509. 1 indexed citations

Hong, Nicole J. Look, Marc Moncrieff, Alexander C. J. van Akkooi, et al.. (2022). Predictors of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Thin Melanoma: An International Multi-institutional Collaboration. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 29(11). 7010–7017. 4 indexed citations

Evans, Jenna M., José Pereira, Craig C. Earle, et al.. (2021). Building capacity for palliative care delivery in primary care settings. Canadian Family Physician. 67(4). 270–278. 14 indexed citations

Sannachi, Lakshmanan, Archya Dasgupta, Daniel DiCenzo, et al.. (2021). A priori prediction of response in multicentre locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients using quantitative ultrasound and derivative texture methods. Oncotarget. 12(2). 81–94. 9 indexed citations

10.

Wright, Frances C., et al.. (2019). Quality of DCIS information on the internet: a content analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 177(2). 295–305. 9 indexed citations

11.

Gagliardi, Anna R., Frances C. Wright, Nicole J. Look Hong, et al.. (2019). National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 174(3). 561–570. 8 indexed citations

12.

Wright, Frances C., Nicole J. Look Hong, Gary Groot, et al.. (2019). Recommendations to improve patient‐centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women. Health Expectations. 23(1). 106–114. 9 indexed citations

13.

Gagliardi, Anna R., Sheila Dunn, Sherry L. Grace, et al.. (2019). How is patient-centred care conceptualized in women’s health: a scoping review. BMC Women s Health. 19(1). 156–156. 18 indexed citations

14.

Wright, Frances C., Nicole J. Look Hong, Gary Groot, et al.. (2018). Patient and provider experiences with active surveillance: A scoping review. PLoS ONE. 13(2). e0192097–e0192097. 21 indexed citations

15.

Gagliardi, Anna R., Gladys Honein‐AbouHaidar, Angel Arnaout, et al.. (2017). How do the characteristics of breast cancer diagnostic assessment programmes influence service delivery: A mixed methods study. European Journal of Cancer Care. 27(2). e12727–e12727. 5 indexed citations

16.

Wright, Frances C., Nicole J. Look Hong, May Lynn Quan, et al.. (2017). Indications for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. Annals of Surgery. 267(2). 271–279. 40 indexed citations

17.

Anderson, Michael, et al.. (2017). The Development of Practice Guidelines for a Palliative Care Multidisciplinary Case Conference. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 55(2). 395–401. 17 indexed citations

18.

Cox, Courtney, et al.. (2013). What is the Burden of Axillary Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Women with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer?. Current Oncology. 20(2). 111–117. 4 indexed citations

19.

Wells, Bryan J., Refik Saskin, Frances C. Wright, David R. McCready, & May Lynn Quan. (2012). Measuring the Quality of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) for Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Evaluation. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 20(2). 615–619. 4 indexed citations

20.

Davidge, Kristen M., Cagla Eskicioglu, Joan E. Lipa, et al.. (2010). Qualitative assessment of patient experiences following sacrectomy. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 101(6). 447–450. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact