Shao‐Wei Chen
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Nephrology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Pao‐Hsien ChuVictor Chien‐Chia WuAn‐Hsun ChouShang‐Hung ChangChih‐Hsiang ChangFeng‐Chun TsaiYi‐Hsin ChanTien‐Hsing Chen
- Topics
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (32 papers)Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (24 papers)Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (24 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American College of CardiologyPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Shao‐Wei Chen
161 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.1k
- Surgery 582
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 489
- Epidemiology 458
- Nephrology 273
Countries citing papers authored by Shao‐Wei Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Shao‐Wei Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shao‐Wei Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shao‐Wei Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shao‐Wei Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shao‐Wei Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shao‐Wei Chen. The network helps show where Shao‐Wei Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shao‐Wei Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shao‐Wei Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shao‐Wei Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shao‐Wei Chen. Shao‐Wei Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Shao‐Wei Chen
Shao‐Wei Chen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Medicine, having authored 165 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (32 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (24 papers) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.1k citations), Internal Medicine (176 citations) and Nephrology (273 citations). Shao‐Wei Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pao‐Hsien Chu, Victor Chien‐Chia Wu, An‐Hsun Chou, Shang‐Hung Chang, Chih‐Hsiang Chang, Feng‐Chun Tsai, Yi‐Hsin Chan, Tien‐Hsing Chen, Dong‐Yi Chen and Yu‐Ting Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.