Michael Wu

1.3k citations
65 papers · 843 indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Wu

62 papers receiving 807 citations

Peers

Michael Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Internal Medicine 40
  • Applied Psychology 52
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 230
  • Social Psychology 188
  • Health 51
Replace Michael J. Merten with:
Michael J. Merten United States
Jeffrey Solomon United States
Yueh‐Ting Lee Taiwan
Sarah Williams United Kingdom
John H. Morgan United States
Sharon L. Hammond United States
H Martı́n United Kingdom
Victoria Senior United Kingdom
James Sinacore United States
Margaret T. Lee United States
Michael Wu relative to Michael J. Merten United States Michael J. Merten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Michael J. Merten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wu. The network helps show where Michael Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Wu Line = papers co-authored together Michael Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201089
2 201683
3 200754
4 201740
5 201131
6 201330
7 201927
8 202127
9 202025
10 202025
11 201522
12 201821
13 201720
14 201920
15 202119
16 201819
17 201918
18 201416
19 202015
20 201414

About Michael Wu

Michael Wu is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Rheumatology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (12 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (12 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (40 citations), Applied Psychology (52 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (230 citations), Social Psychology (188 citations) and Health (51 citations). Michael Wu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and China. Frequent co-authors include Chan Zhou, Adam B. Cohen, Buxin Han, Victor Chien‐Chia Wu, Shao‐Wei Chen, Pao‐Hsien Chu, Chien‐Chang Lee, Christine Ma‐Kellams, Shang‐Hung Chang and Juan Li. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Journal of the American Heart Association, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact