Shakra Jamil

561 citations
21 papers · 305 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Shakra Jamil

21 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Shakra Jamil
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Plant Science 243
  • Business and International Management 8
  • Aging 4
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 22
  • Molecular Biology 133
Replace Rahil Shahzad with:
Rahil Shahzad Pakistan
Manrong Zha China
Huaqin Kuang China
Yozo Nagira Japan
Kaitlin J. Palla United States
Nishat Passricha India
Lia Shooshtari Iran
Ziqi Chen China
E. Kokiladevi India
Redeat Tibebu United States
Shakra Jamil relative to Rahil Shahzad Pakistan Rahil Shahzad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rahil Shahzad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shakra Jamil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shakra Jamil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shakra Jamil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shakra Jamil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shakra Jamil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shakra Jamil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shakra Jamil. The network helps show where Shakra Jamil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shakra Jamil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shakra Jamil Line = papers co-authored together Shakra Jamil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202163
2 202154
3 202047
4 202137
5 201217
6 201912
7 202012
8 201710
9 20208
10 20237
11 20216
12 20205
13 20244
14 20214
15 20214
16 20214
17 20224
18 20213
19 20192
20 20241

About Shakra Jamil

Shakra Jamil is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Endocrinology, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (3 papers), Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (2 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (243 citations), Business and International Management (8 citations), Aging (4 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (22 citations) and Molecular Biology (133 citations). Shakra Jamil has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rahil Shahzad, Shakeel Ahmad, Xiukang Wang, Rana Muhammad Atif, Rida Fatima, Zhonghua Sheng, Gundra Sivakrishna Rao, Gaoneng Shao, Xiangjin Wei and Shikai Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Nutrition, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, PeerJ, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences and The Plant Pathology Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact