Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Virtual(ly) Athletes: Where eSports Fit Within the Definition of “Sport”
2016335 citationsSeth E. Jenny, R. Douglas Manning et al.Questprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Seth E. Jenny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seth E. Jenny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seth E. Jenny more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seth E. Jenny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seth E. Jenny. The network helps show where Seth E. Jenny may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Seth E. Jenny
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Seth E. Jenny.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Seth E. Jenny based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Seth E. Jenny. Seth E. Jenny is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jenny, Seth E., et al.. (2024). Routledge Handbook of Esports. Clark Digital Commons (Clark University).11 indexed citations
Ahn, Joseph, et al.. (2020). The one billion dollar myth: Methods for sizing the massively undervalued esports revenue landscape. 1(1).36 indexed citations
Manning, R. Douglas, et al.. (2019). Stakeholders' Perception of Critical Risks and Challenges Hosting Marathon Events: An Exploratory Study. Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi). 13(1). 11.6 indexed citations
Manning, R. Douglas, Seth E. Jenny, Margaret C. Keiper, & Dan Drane. (2016). Hall of Shame Revisited: The Appropriateness and Legal Implications of Employer-Sponsored Dodgeball and Kickball Events. 10(3). 215.1 indexed citations
15.
Jenny, Seth E., R. Douglas Manning, Margaret C. Keiper, & Tracy Warren Olrich. (2016). Virtual(ly) Athletes: Where eSports Fit Within the Definition of “Sport”. Quest. 69(1). 1–18.335 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Jenny, Seth E., et al.. (2015). Motion-Based Video Game and Authentic Wall/Rock Climbing: Motivations and Perceptions of Novice Climbers.. 11(1). 35–49.3 indexed citations
17.
Jenny, Seth E., et al.. (2014). Exploring the Effectiveness of Learning American Football through Playing the Video Game "Madden NFL".. 10(1). 72–87.8 indexed citations
18.
Jenny, Seth E., et al.. (2014). A Case Study of a Successful Men's NCAA Division I Cross Country Coach: Essential Elements and Components of a Humanistic Approach. 8(3). 123.
19.
Jenny, Seth E.. (2013). A Case Study of the Coaching Philosophy of a Men's NCAA Distance Running Coach: To what extent is it Humanistic?. UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico).
20.
Jenny, Seth E., et al.. (2013). Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of Motion-Based Video Gaming in Physical Education.. 9(1). 96–111.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.