Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Academic entrepreneurship in Spanish universities: An analysis of the determinants of entrepreneurial intention
2017239 citationsFrancisco Javier Miranda González, Antonio Chamorro Mera et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Sergio Rubio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sergio Rubio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sergio Rubio more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sergio Rubio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sergio Rubio. The network helps show where Sergio Rubio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sergio Rubio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sergio Rubio.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sergio Rubio based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sergio Rubio. Sergio Rubio is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rubio, Sergio, Beatriz Jiménez‐Parra, Antonio Chamorro Mera, & Francisco Javier Miranda González. (2019). Reverse Logistics and Urban Logistics: Making a Link. Sustainability. 11(20). 5684–5684.12 indexed citations
González, Francisco Javier Miranda, et al.. (2013). Evaluation of Social Networks Sites in the Banking Sector: An Analysis of Top 200International Banks. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce. 18(2). 1–17.12 indexed citations
13.
Rubio, Sergio, Antonio Chamorro Mera, & Francisco Javier Miranda González. (2007). La investigación sobre gestión medioambiental en la empresa en España (1993-2003). Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).1 indexed citations
14.
Rubio, Sergio, Francisco Javier Miranda González, Antonio Chamorro Mera, & Víctor Valero Amaro. (2007). Desarrollo de un sistema de logística inversa en el grupo industrial Alfonso Gallardo.. Universia business review. 3(15). 88–99.1 indexed citations
Mera, Antonio Chamorro, Francisco Javier Miranda González, & Sergio Rubio. (2006). EL ESTADO DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN SOBRE MARKETINGECOLÓGICO EN ESPAÑA: ANÁLISIS DE REVISTASESPAÑOLAS 1993-2003. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa. 12(2). 137–156.7 indexed citations
17.
Rubio, Sergio, Antonio Chamorro Mera, & Francisco Javier Miranda González. (2006). Un análisis de la investigación sobre contabilidad medioambiental en España. 6(2). 29–43.3 indexed citations
Mera, Antonio Chamorro & Sergio Rubio. (2004). Los sistemas de distribución inversa para la recuperación de residuos: su desarrollo en España. Distribución y consumo. 14(76). 59–73.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.