Seema Hakim

409 citations
20 papers · 264 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Seema Hakim

17 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Seema Hakim
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Microbiology 81
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 35
  • Reproductive Medicine 35
  • Pharmaceutical Science 15
  • Food Science 36
Replace Fernando Gómez‐Chávez with:
Fernando Gómez‐Chávez Mexico
S Kovachev Bulgaria
Brian E. Ford United Kingdom
Sassan Rezaie Iran
Najmeh Karami Iran
Natalie A. Clark United States
Changchang Ye China
Meeme Utt Estonia
Katarzyna Leszczyńska Poland
Claus Gyrup Nielsen Denmark
Seema Hakim relative to Fernando Gómez‐Chávez Mexico Fernando Gómez‐Chávez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Fernando Gómez‐Chávez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Seema Hakim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Seema Hakim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seema Hakim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seema Hakim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Seema Hakim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seema Hakim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seema Hakim. The network helps show where Seema Hakim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Seema Hakim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Seema Hakim Line = papers co-authored together Seema Hakim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200854
2 200550
3
Chlamydia trachomatis infection & female infertility.
200642
4 200732
5 200732
6
Clinco-Pathological Patterns in Women with Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding.
201613
7 20189
8 20117
9 20156
10 20226
11 20123
12 20112
13
Evaluation of hematological profile of cord blood a nd placental histopathology in neonates with perinatal asphyxia.
20122
14 20192
15
Quizzing as an innovative Teaching-Learning technique for undergraduate dental students
20211
16 20141
17 20141
18 20101
19 20230
20 20240

About Seema Hakim

Seema Hakim is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Immunology and Plant Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Mast cells and histamine (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (2 papers) and Garlic and Onion Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (81 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (35 citations), Reproductive Medicine (35 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (15 citations) and Food Science (36 citations). Seema Hakim has collaborated with scholars based in India. Frequent co-authors include Meher Rizvi, Abida Malik, Indu Shukla, Mohammad Owais, Yogeshwer Shukla, Md. Arif Khan, Neetu Kalra, Deepa Bisht, Amjad Mumtaz Khan and Nadeem Ahmad. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, Molecular Medicine, Journal of drug targeting, Fertility and Sterility and Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact