Annals of Diagnostic Pathology

2.2k papers and 28.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 28.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology usually cover Surgery (690 papers), Oncology (684 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (675 papers) specifically the topics of Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (275 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (146 papers) and Soft tissue tumor case studies (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology are Cyril Fisher, Richard A. Prayson, Khin Thway, Norman J. Carr, René J. Buesa, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Jorge Albores‐Saavedra, Jae Y. Ro, Julie C. Fanburg‐Smith and Mark R. Wick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Diagnostic Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025