Scott Z. Fields

2.9k citations
46 papers · 2.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 21

Scott Z. Fields

45 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Topotecan Versus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Vincr...6941999202620082017200400600

Peers

Scott Z. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Reproductive Medicine 465
  • Oncology 1.5k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 182
  • Epidemiology 707
  • Molecular Biology 1.2k
Replace A.G.J. van der Zee with:
A.G.J. van der Zee Netherlands
Yasunobu Kanamori Japan
J. J. Kavanagh United States
Susan Ellard Canada
G. Veerman Netherlands
Vicki V. Baker United States
Ryusuke Murakami Japan
Phyllis C. Huettner United States
Baukelien van Triest Netherlands
Yuji Ikeda Japan
Scott Z. Fields relative to A.G.J. van der Zee Netherlands A.G.J. van der Zee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
A.G.J. van der Zee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Z. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Z. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Z. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Z. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Z. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Z. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Z. Fields. The network helps show where Scott Z. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Z. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Z. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Scott Z. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20173
2 20164
3 201628
4 201612
5 20146
6 20132
7 201253
8 201023
9 20081
10 2004182
11 200282
12 200110
13 20008
14 1998281
15 199818
16
Oral topotecan given once or twice daily for ten days: a phase I pharmacology study in adult patients with solid tumors.
199834
17 199611
18 199527
19 199474
20 19920

About Scott Z. Fields

Scott Z. Fields is a scholar working on Oncology, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Hematology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (24 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (19 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (9 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Neutropenia and Cancer Infections (6 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (4 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (465 citations), Oncology (1.5k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (182 citations), Epidemiology (707 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.2k citations). Scott Z. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Lane, Joachim von Pawel, Graham Ross, James Carmichael, A Depierre, Joan H. Schiller, David J. Stewart, Martin Palmer, Richard J. Gralla and Frances A. Shepherd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, European Journal of Cancer, Clinical Cancer Research, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology and International Journal of Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026