Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Wright
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Wright more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Wright. The network helps show where Jonathan Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Wright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Wright.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Wright based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Wright. Jonathan Wright is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Strassel, Stephanie, et al.. (2020). Call My Net 2: A New Resource for Speaker Recognition.. Language Resources and Evaluation. 6621–6626.
3.
Cieri, Christopher, et al.. (2020). LanguageARC: Developing Language Resources Through Citizen Linguistics. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1–6.3 indexed citations
4.
Cieri, Christopher, et al.. (2018). Introducing NIEUW: Novel Incentives and Workflows for Eliciting Linguistic Data.. Language Resources and Evaluation.1 indexed citations
5.
Cieri, Christopher, et al.. (2018). From ‘Solved Problems’ to New Challenges: A Report on LDC Activities. Language Resources and Evaluation.1 indexed citations
Cieri, Christopher, et al.. (2014). New Directions for Language Resource Development and Distribution. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1539–1546.1 indexed citations
9.
Wright, Jonathan. (2014). RESTful Annotation and Efficient Collaboration. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1692–1698.3 indexed citations
10.
Song, Zhiyi, et al.. (2014). Collecting Natural SMS and Chat Conversations in Multiple Languages: The BOLT Phase 2 Corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1699–1704.11 indexed citations
11.
Ellis, Joe, et al.. (2012). Linguistic Resources for 2012 Knowledge Base Population Evaluations. Theory and applications of categories.13 indexed citations
12.
Wright, Jonathan, et al.. (2012). Annotation Trees: LDC's customizable, extensible, scalable, annotation infrastructure. Language Resources and Evaluation. 479–485.7 indexed citations
13.
Ellis, Joe, et al.. (2011). Linguistic Resources for 2011 Knowledge Base Population Evaluation.. Theory and applications of categories.3 indexed citations
14.
Mæda, Kazuaki, et al.. (2010). Technical Infrastructure at Linguistic Data Consortium: Software and Hardware Resources for Linguistic Data Creation.. Language Resources and Evaluation.1 indexed citations
15.
Wright, Jonathan, et al.. (2001). Liberalism, Anti-Semitism, and Democracy. Essays in Honour of Peter Pulzer. Oxford University Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
Bradley, John & Jonathan Wright. (1993). Two regional economies in Ireland. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.