Scott W. Rogers
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Immunology top 5%
- Neurology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Martin RechsteinerLorise C. GahringEdson X. AlbuquerqueManickavasagom AlkondonEdna F. R. PereiraStephen F. HeinemannA O'Shea-GreenfieldMichael Hollmann
- Topics
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (38 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (31 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPoland
In The Last Decade
Scott W. Rogers
83 papers receiving 9.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Molecular Biology 6.9k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.8k
- Cell Biology 816
- Immunology 734
- Neurology 692
Countries citing papers authored by Scott W. Rogers
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott W. Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott W. Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott W. Rogers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott W. Rogers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott W. Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott W. Rogers. The network helps show where Scott W. Rogers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott W. Rogers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott W. Rogers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott W. Rogers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott W. Rogers. Scott W. Rogers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | Mammalian Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: From Structure to Functionbreakdown → | 1319 |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 73 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 100 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 173 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 284 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Cloning by functional expression of a member of the glutamate receptor familybreakdown → | 845 |
About Scott W. Rogers
Scott W. Rogers is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Molecular Biology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 9.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (38 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (31 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.8k citations), Molecular Biology (6.9k citations) and Neurology (692 citations). Scott W. Rogers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Martin Rechsteiner, Lorise C. Gahring, Edson X. Albuquerque, Manickavasagom Alkondon, Edna F. R. Pereira, Stephen F. Heinemann, A O'Shea-Greenfield, Michael Hollmann, Noel G. Carlson and Roy E. Twyman. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.