Scott R. Braithwaite
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Health top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Edward A. SelbyThomas E. JoinerTracy K. WitteKimberly A. Van OrdenKelly C. CukrowiczFrank D. FinchamJulianne Holt‐LunstadRaquel Delevi
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (16 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (13 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPsychological ReviewJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Scott R. Braithwaite
36 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Clinical Psychology 4.0k
- Social Psychology 2.0k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 806
- Health 717
Countries citing papers authored by Scott R. Braithwaite
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott R. Braithwaite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott R. Braithwaite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott R. Braithwaite more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott R. Braithwaite
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott R. Braithwaite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott R. Braithwaite. The network helps show where Scott R. Braithwaite may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott R. Braithwaite
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott R. Braithwaite. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott R. Braithwaite based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott R. Braithwaite. Scott R. Braithwaite is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 176 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 108 | |
| 12 | 115 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 81 | |
| 17 | The interpersonal theory of suicide.breakdown → | 3513 |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 59 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Scott R. Braithwaite
Scott R. Braithwaite is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (16 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (13 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (4.0k citations), Social Psychology (2.0k citations) and Health (717 citations). Scott R. Braithwaite has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Edward A. Selby, Thomas E. Joiner, Tracy K. Witte, Kimberly A. Van Orden, Kelly C. Cukrowicz, Frank D. Fincham, Julianne Holt‐Lunstad, Raquel Delevi, Nathaniel M. Lambert and Steven R. H. Beach. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Review and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.