Scott Lamont

1.7k total citations
55 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Scott Lamont is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott Lamont has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in General Health Professions, 17 papers in Clinical Psychology and 12 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Scott Lamont's work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (11 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers). Scott Lamont is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (11 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers). Scott Lamont collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and South Korea. Scott Lamont's co-authors include Scott Brunero, Mary Chiarella, Greg Fairbrother, Lin Perry, Christine Duffield, Robyn Gallagher, Yun‐Hee Jeon, Cameron Stewart, Mary Margaret Kelly and Rachel Nicholls and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Advanced Nursing and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

In The Last Decade

Scott Lamont

52 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Scott Lamont
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • General Health Professions 594
  • Clinical Psychology 323
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 294
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 212
  • Social Psychology 177
Replace Scott Brunero with:
Scott Brunero Australia
Pamela van der Riet Australia
Hossein Ebrahimi Iran
Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi Iran
Giovanna Artioli Italy
Tanya Park Canada
Martha Raile Alligood United States
Susan D. Newman United States
Jeanne M. Sorrell United States
Maria Arman Sweden
Scott Brunero Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Scott Lamont
Scott Lamont · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Scott Lamont
Scott Lamont · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Lamont

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Lamont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Lamont

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Lamont. The network helps show where Scott Lamont may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Lamont

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Lamont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Lamont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Lamont. Scott Lamont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 5
3 3
4 2
5 11
6 9
7 2
8 2
9 4
10
Decision-Making Capacity and its Relationship to a Legally Valid Consent: Ethical, Legal and Professional Context.
6
11 47
12 4
13 8
14 32
15 17
16 12
17 41
18 44
19 65
20 40

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026