Scott Blinder

1.0k citations
19 papers · 594 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Blinder

19 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Scott Blinder
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Communication 94
  • Political Science and International Relations 291
  • Sociology and Political Science 472
  • Gender Studies 75
  • General Social Sciences 11
Replace Elizabeth Poole with:
Elizabeth Poole United Kingdom
Jonathan D. Weiler United States
Nora Theorin Sweden
Russell Jeung United States
Irene Zempi United Kingdom
Alin M. Ceobanu United States
Daniel Herda United States
Rafal Zaborowski United Kingdom
Anne Aly Australia
Eyo Mensah Nigeria
Scott Blinder relative to Elizabeth Poole United Kingdom Elizabeth Poole's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Elizabeth Poole · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Blinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Blinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Blinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Blinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Blinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Blinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Blinder. The network helps show where Scott Blinder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Scott Blinder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Blinder Line = papers co-authored together Scott Blinder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2013138
2 2013138
3 201596
4 201046
5 201743
6 201324
7 201917
8 202015
9 201814
10 201912
11 200711
12 201911
13 20188
14 20187
15 20176
16 20144
17
Imagined Immigration: The Different Meanings of 'Immigrants' in Public Opinion and Policy Debates in Britain
20122
18
Media reporting of migrants and migration
20171
19
The anti-racism norm in West European politics: Why we need to consider it and how to measure it
20081

About Scott Blinder

Scott Blinder is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (94 citations), Political Science and International Relations (291 citations), Sociology and Political Science (472 citations), Gender Studies (75 citations) and General Social Sciences (11 citations). Scott Blinder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth Ivarsflaten, Robert Ford, William Allen, Nicole Martin, Brian Schaffner and Meredith Rolfe. Their work appears in journals such as Political Behavior, American Journal of Political Science, Political Studies, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies and International Migration Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact