Scott Blinder

1.0k total citations
19 papers, 594 citations indexed

About

Scott Blinder is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott Blinder has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 594 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Scott Blinder's work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers). Scott Blinder is often cited by papers focused on Migration, Refugees, and Integration (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers). Scott Blinder collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Scott Blinder's co-authors include Elisabeth Ivarsflaten, Robert Ford, William Allen, Nicole Martin, Brian Schaffner and Meredith Rolfe and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Political Science, International Migration Review and Comparative Political Studies.

In The Last Decade

Scott Blinder

19 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Scott Blinder United States	12	472	291	94	75	61	19	594
Russell Jeung United States	7	325 0.7×	135 0.5×	58 0.6×	62 0.8×	60 1.0×	18	418
Elizabeth Poole United Kingdom	10	421 0.9×	136 0.5×	184 2.0×	67 0.9×	25 0.4×	20	580
Alin M. Ceobanu United States	8	866 1.8×	340 1.2×	37 0.4×	33 0.4×	108 1.8×	14	937
Nora Theorin Sweden	7	287 0.6×	119 0.4×	152 1.6×	22 0.3×	45 0.7×	10	396
Irene Zempi United Kingdom	12	342 0.7×	89 0.3×	49 0.5×	104 1.4×	44 0.7×	25	458
Jonathan D. Weiler United States	3	378 0.8×	265 0.9×	64 0.7×	46 0.6×	17 0.3×	6	484
Michael Savelkoul Netherlands	10	402 0.9×	134 0.5×	27 0.3×	24 0.3×	36 0.6×	18	469
Amir Saeed United Kingdom	5	316 0.7×	70 0.2×	76 0.8×	93 1.2×	19 0.3×	19	402
Stelian Medianu Canada	3	312 0.7×	58 0.2×	92 1.0×	23 0.3×	85 1.4×	5	397
Daniel Herda United States	12	398 0.8×	175 0.6×	27 0.3×	34 0.5×	62 1.0×	31	466

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Blinder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Blinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Blinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Blinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Blinder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Blinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Blinder. The network helps show where Scott Blinder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Blinder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Blinder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Blinder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Blinder. Scott Blinder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Martin, Nicole & Scott Blinder. (2020). Biases at the Ballot Box: How Multiple Forms of Voter Discrimination Impede the Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Ethnic Minority Groups. Political Behavior. 43(4). 1487–1510. 15 indexed citations

Blinder, Scott & Brian Schaffner. (2019). Going with the Flows: Information that Changes Americans’ Immigration Preferences. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 32(1). 153–164. 11 indexed citations

Blinder, Scott, Robert Ford, & Elisabeth Ivarsflaten. (2019). Discrimination, Antiprejudice Norms, and Public Support for Multicultural Policies in Europe: The Case of Religious Schools. Comparative Political Studies. 52(8). 1232–1255. 17 indexed citations

Blinder, Scott, et al.. (2019). Acceptable in the EU? Why some immigration restrictionists support European Union mobility. European Union Politics. 20(3). 468–491. 12 indexed citations

Blinder, Scott, et al.. (2018). Roots of group threat: anti-prejudice motivations and implicit bias in perceptions of immigrants as threats. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 42(12). 1971–1989. 14 indexed citations

Allen, William & Scott Blinder. (2018). Media Independence through Routine Press-State Relations: Immigration and Government Statistics in the British Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 23(2). 202–226. 8 indexed citations

Allen, William, et al.. (2018). Chapter 8 – Media reporting of migrants and migration. 2018(1). 7 indexed citations

Blinder, Scott, et al.. (2017). Media reporting of migrants and migration. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations

Blinder, Scott, et al.. (2017). The ‘illegal’ and the skilled: effects of media portrayals on perceptions of immigrants in Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 44(9). 1444–1462. 43 indexed citations

10.

Blinder, Scott & Meredith Rolfe. (2017). Rethinking Compassion: Toward a Political Account of the Partisan Gender Gap in the United States. Political Psychology. 39(4). 889–906. 6 indexed citations

11.

Blinder, Scott & William Allen. (2015). Constructing Immigrants: Portrayals of Migrant Groups in British National Newspapers, 2010–2012. International Migration Review. 50(1). 3–40. 96 indexed citations

12.

Blinder, Scott, et al.. (2014). Numbers and Waves, the Illegal and the Skilled: The Effects of Media Portrayals of Immigrants on Public Opinion in Britain. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

13.

Blinder, Scott, Robert Ford, & Elisabeth Ivarsflaten. (2013). The Better Angels of Our Nature: How the Antiprejudice Norm Affects Policy and Party Preferences in Great Britain and Germany. American Journal of Political Science. 57(4). 841–857. 138 indexed citations

14.

Allen, William & Scott Blinder. (2013). Migration in the News: Portrayals of Immigrants, Migrants, Asylum Seekers and Refugees in National British Newspapers, 2010-2012. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 24 indexed citations

15.

Blinder, Scott. (2013). Imagined Immigration: The Impact of Different Meanings of ‘Immigrants’ in Public Opinion and Policy Debates in Britain. Political Studies. 63(1). 80–100. 138 indexed citations

16.

Blinder, Scott. (2012). Imagined Immigration: The Different Meanings of 'Immigrants' in Public Opinion and Policy Debates in Britain. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

17.

Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth, Scott Blinder, & Robert Ford. (2010). The Anti‐Racism Norm in Western European Immigration Politics: Why we Need to Consider it and How to Measure it. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 20(4). 421–445. 46 indexed citations

18.

Blinder, Scott, et al.. (2008). The anti-racism norm in West European politics: Why we need to consider it and how to measure it. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1 indexed citations

19.

Blinder, Scott. (2007). Dissonance Persists. American Politics Research. 35(3). 299–335. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact