Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Assessing progress of tourism sustainability: Developing and validating sustainability indicators
Countries citing papers authored by Satinder Kumar
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Satinder Kumar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Satinder Kumar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Satinder Kumar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Satinder Kumar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Satinder Kumar. The network helps show where Satinder Kumar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Satinder Kumar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Satinder Kumar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Satinder Kumar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Satinder Kumar. Satinder Kumar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kumar, Satinder, et al.. (2021). User Behavior Intention Towards E-Hailing Applications. 274–278.2 indexed citations
10.
Kumar, Satinder, et al.. (2021). Why Consumers Dont Walk Their Talk The Moderation Effect Of Availability And Price Between Green Intention And Buying Behavior. Academy of Marketing Studies journal. 25(4).3 indexed citations
11.
Kumar, Satinder, et al.. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model and Social Commerce Sites Usage: An Impact of Social Influence and Social Capital. Academy of Marketing Studies journal. 24(3).1 indexed citations
Kumar, Satinder, et al.. (2017). EFFECTS OF ONLINE ADVERTISING ON CONSUMERS IN COIMBATORE CITY. International Education and Research Journal. 3(9).3 indexed citations
14.
Kumar, Satinder & Surender Singh. (2014). Trends in growth rates in Area, production and productivity of sugarcane in Haryana. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences. 3(4). 117–124.7 indexed citations
15.
Kumar, Satinder, et al.. (2013). Indian Reality TV Shows: An Empirical Study on Perceptions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
16.
Kumar, Satinder, et al.. (2013). Investment Feasibility and Marketing of Jasmine in Chitradurga District. 6(1). 9–13.2 indexed citations
17.
Kumar, Satinder, et al.. (2012). Perceptual study of spamming an unethical practices in E-marketing. 3(1). 1–25.1 indexed citations
18.
Kumar, Satinder, et al.. (2011). 1. THE SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES IN GCCS: A COMPARISON BETWEEN SULTANATE OF OMAN AND UNITED ARAB EMIRATES. International journal of research in commerce, economics and management.2 indexed citations
19.
Williamson, Ian, Sarah Benge, Michael Moore, et al.. (2006). Acute sinusitis: which factors do FPs believe are most diagnostic and best predict antibiotic efficacy?. PubMed. 55(9). 789–96.3 indexed citations
20.
Kumar, Rakesh, et al.. (2006). EFFECT OF TILLAGE AND NITROGEN LEVELS ON GROWTH AND YIELD. Annals of Agricultural Research. 27(2).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.