Sarah Young

4.6k total citations
86 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Sarah Young is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Young has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 12 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Young's work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers). Sarah Young is often cited by papers focused on Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers). Sarah Young collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Sarah Young's co-authors include Donna M. Peehl, Anthony D. Ong, Andrew Steptoe, Sara Y. Kim, Anthony P. Fernandez, Phillipa Hay, Stephen Touyz, Yuya Kobayashi, Devin Absher and James D. Brooks and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Clinical Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Young

83 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Young United States 17 233 226 172 127 125 86 1.2k
Ji‐Yeon Kim South Korea 20 208 0.9× 221 1.0× 54 0.3× 131 1.0× 108 0.9× 67 1.4k
Zhenshun Cheng China 12 176 0.8× 174 0.8× 130 0.8× 100 0.8× 277 2.2× 24 1.4k
Catherine Johnson United States 19 454 1.9× 129 0.6× 79 0.5× 285 2.2× 121 1.0× 67 1.5k
Hung‐Yu Lin Taiwan 17 223 1.0× 222 1.0× 77 0.4× 275 2.2× 79 0.6× 65 1.2k
Jong‐Eun Lee South Korea 16 95 0.4× 227 1.0× 105 0.6× 86 0.7× 76 0.6× 62 956
Huailiang Wu China 12 122 0.5× 121 0.5× 106 0.6× 52 0.4× 56 0.4× 30 670
Isabelle Bray United Kingdom 24 513 2.2× 175 0.8× 233 1.4× 136 1.1× 52 0.4× 65 1.9k
Qi Xue China 15 740 3.2× 213 0.9× 93 0.5× 182 1.4× 114 0.9× 47 1.5k
Michael J. Merten United States 16 219 0.9× 195 0.9× 145 0.8× 190 1.5× 88 0.7× 33 1.3k
Sharon Ryan United States 22 258 1.1× 158 0.7× 86 0.5× 119 0.9× 391 3.1× 68 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Young. The network helps show where Sarah Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Young. Sarah Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lieber, Sarah B., Sarah Young, JoAnn Vega, et al.. (2025). Infant feeding experiences of women with systemic lupus erythematosus: A qualitative study. Lupus. 34(4). 365–373.
2.
Lagisz, Malgorzata, Yefeng Yang, Sarah Young, & Shinichi Nakagawa. (2025). A practical guide to evaluating sensitivity of literature search strings for systematic reviews using relative recall. Research Synthesis Methods. 16(1). 1–14. 4 indexed citations
3.
Anzell, Anthony R., et al.. (2024). Blood flow regulates acvrl1 transcription via ligand-dependent Alk1 activity. Angiogenesis. 27(3). 501–522. 4 indexed citations
4.
Young, Sarah, H. Robson MacDonald, Diana Louden, et al.. (2024). Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 20(3). e1432–e1432. 1 indexed citations
5.
Cusmano‐Ozog, Kristina, Dietrich Matern, Thomas Long, Nicola Longo, & Sarah Young. (2024). College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 101912–101912. 1 indexed citations
6.
Lieber, Sarah B., Sarah Young, Dongmei Sun, et al.. (2024). The Lived Experiences of Older Adults With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Patient Perspectives. The Journal of Rheumatology. 52(2). jrheum.2024–478. 1 indexed citations
8.
MacDonald, H. Robson, Margaret Foster, Patrick Labelle, et al.. (2024). Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 20(3). e1433–e1433. 12 indexed citations
10.
Rousseau, Denise M., et al.. (2023). Does chief executive compensation predict financial performance or inaccurate financial reporting in listed companies: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 19(4). e1370–e1370. 5 indexed citations
11.
Haddaway, Neal, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Julie Glanville, et al.. (2022). A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searching. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 18(4). e1288–e1288. 9 indexed citations
12.
Ghezzi‐Kopel, Kate, Florian Diekmann, Erin Eldermire, et al.. (2021). Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals. Research Synthesis Methods. 13(1). 77–87. 8 indexed citations
13.
Young, Sarah, Alison Bethel, Ciara Keenan, et al.. (2021). PROTOCOL: Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: An assessment of current methods. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 17(4). e1208–e1208. 6 indexed citations
14.
Zhong, Yongqi, et al.. (2021). Collaboration on evidence synthesis in Africa: a network study of growing research capacity. Health Research Policy and Systems. 19(1). 126–126. 6 indexed citations
15.
Young, Sarah, Soraya Azari, William C. Becker, et al.. (2019). Common and Challenging Behaviors Among Individuals on Long-term Opioid Therapy. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 14(4). 305–310. 11 indexed citations
16.
Rousseau, Denise M., et al.. (2019). PROTOCOL: Does executive compensation predict publicly traded firms’ financial performance or inaccurate financial reporting?. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 15(4). e1064–e1064. 2 indexed citations
17.
Merlin, Jessica S., Sarah Young, Mallory O. Johnson, et al.. (2018). Intervention Mapping to develop a Social Cognitive Theory-based intervention for chronic pain tailored to individuals with HIV. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 10. 9–16. 9 indexed citations
18.
Ong, Anthony D., Sara Y. Kim, Sarah Young, & Andrew Steptoe. (2016). Positive affect and sleep: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 35. 21–32. 126 indexed citations
19.
Merlin, Jessica S., Sarah Young, Soraya Azari, et al.. (2016). Management of problematic behaviours among individuals on long-term opioid therapy: protocol for a Delphi study. BMJ Open. 6(5). e011619–e011619. 16 indexed citations
20.
Tian, Junqiang, Hongjuan Zhao, Rosalie Nolley, et al.. (2012). Darinaparsin: Solid Tumor Hypoxic Cytotoxin and Radiosensitizer. Clinical Cancer Research. 18(12). 3366–3376. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026