Sarah S. Garber
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 5
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 4
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Ion channel regulation and function 15
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study 4
- Sensory Systems top 10%
-
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 5
- Environmental Chemistry top 10%
-
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 7
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 6
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 3
- Co-authors
- Richard W. AldrichToshinori HoshiChristopher MillerEdward MoczydlowskiChristopher S. MillerIrena LevitanMichael D. CahalanPaul Ross
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sarah S. Garber
32 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 461
- Molecular Biology 792
- Sensory Systems 44
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 151
- Environmental Chemistry 61
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah S. Garber
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah S. Garber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah S. Garber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah S. Garber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah S. Garber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah S. Garber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah S. Garber. The network helps show where Sarah S. Garber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah S. Garber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 80 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 77 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 90 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 33 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 82 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 125 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 104 |
About Sarah S. Garber
Sarah S. Garber is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Infectious Diseases and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (15 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (461 citations), Molecular Biology (792 citations) and Sensory Systems (44 citations). Sarah S. Garber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Aldrich, Toshinori Hoshi, Christopher Miller, Edward Moczydlowski, Christopher S. Miller, Irena Levitan, Michael D. Cahalan, Paul Ross, Gary Strichartz and Sherwood Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Neuron and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.