Sarah M. Stow
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Co-authors
- John A. McLeanJody C. MayJohn C. FjeldstedRichard SmithErin BakerStephan HannTim CausonXueyun Zheng
- Topics
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (16 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (9 papers)Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (8 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyEnvironmental Science & TechnologyAnalytical Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
Sarah M. Stow
16 papers receiving 791 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Spectroscopy 617
- Molecular Biology 375
- Analytical Chemistry 94
- Biomedical Engineering 85
- Computational Mechanics 64
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah M. Stow
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah M. Stow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah M. Stow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah M. Stow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah M. Stow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah M. Stow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah M. Stow. The network helps show where Sarah M. Stow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah M. Stow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah M. Stow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah M. Stow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah M. Stow. Sarah M. Stow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | An Interlaboratory Evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility–Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurementsbreakdown → | 427 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 75 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 7 |
About Sarah M. Stow
Sarah M. Stow is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry and Biochemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (9 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (617 citations), Analytical Chemistry (94 citations) and Molecular Biology (375 citations). Sarah M. Stow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include John A. McLean, Jody C. May, John C. Fjeldsted, Richard Smith, Erin Baker, Stephan Hann, Tim Causon, Xueyun Zheng, Ruwan T. Kurulugama and Teresa Mairinger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Environmental Science & Technology and Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.