Sarah L. Mott

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
186 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Sarah L. Mott is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah L. Mott has authored 186 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 67 papers in Oncology, 55 papers in Surgery and 46 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Sarah L. Mott's work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (31 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (30 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers). Sarah L. Mott is often cited by papers focused on Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (31 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (30 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers). Sarah L. Mott collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Sarah L. Mott's co-authors include Michael A. O’Donnell, Ryan L. Steinberg, Anna M. Button, Kenneth G. Nepple, James J. Mezhir, Aileen Clarke, Nick Black, Vignesh T. Packiam, S. Joglekar and Aeen Asghar and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Sarah L. Mott

165 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Comparison of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Doc... 2023 2026 2024 2025 2023 20 40 60

Peers

Sarah L. Mott
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Surgery 659
  • Oncology 530
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 401
  • Physiology 291
  • Molecular Biology 280
Replace Khaled Mohammed with:
Khaled Mohammed United States
Eunice Chang United States
Achim Wöckel Germany
Anna K.L. Reyners Netherlands
Ning Liu Canada
David Yeates United Kingdom
Bryan Fellman United States
Unn‐Britt Johansson Sweden
Michael N. Patlas Canada
Ingrid Glimelius Sweden
Khaled Mohammed United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Sarah L. Mott
Sarah L. Mott · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Sarah L. Mott
Sarah L. Mott · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah L. Mott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah L. Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah L. Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah L. Mott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah L. Mott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah L. Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah L. Mott. The network helps show where Sarah L. Mott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah L. Mott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah L. Mott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah L. Mott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah L. Mott. Sarah L. Mott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 4
3 2
4 0
5 6
6 2
7 1
8 6
9 1
10 2
11 9
12 4
13 6
14 12
15 0
16 0
17 13
18 89
19 14
20
Leading opinions: Should nurses set national priorities for a clinical research agenda?
1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026