Anna M. Button
- Oncology top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bruce A. SmithJames J. MezhirSarah L. MottJohn M. BuattiE. J. ClarkS. JoglekarBenjamin JohnsonAeen Asghar
- Topics
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBlood
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Anna M. Button
38 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Oncology 367
- Physiology 353
- Molecular Biology 299
- Surgery 257
- Cancer Research 195
Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Button
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Button more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Button
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Button. The network helps show where Anna M. Button may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M. Button
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M. Button. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M. Button based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M. Button. Anna M. Button is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 89 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 59 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 67 | |
| 15 | 178 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Complication rates after internal carotid stenting in high-risk, symptomatic patients | 3 |
| 20 | Reversed ophthalmic artery flow is very specific for critical ICA stenosis or occlusion using power-M mode Doppler | 1 |
About Anna M. Button
Anna M. Button is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (111 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (107 citations) and Physiology (353 citations). Anna M. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bruce A. Smith, James J. Mezhir, Sarah L. Mott, John M. Buatti, E. J. Clark, S. Joglekar, Benjamin Johnson, Aeen Asghar, Sudershan K. Bhatia and Douglas R. Spitz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.