Anna M. Button

1.8k total citations
42 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Anna M. Button is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna M. Button has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Oncology, 10 papers in Cancer Research and 9 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in Anna M. Button's work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers). Anna M. Button is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers). Anna M. Button collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Anna M. Button's co-authors include Bruce A. Smith, James J. Mezhir, Sarah L. Mott, John M. Buatti, E. J. Clark, S. Joglekar, Benjamin Johnson, Aeen Asghar, Sudershan K. Bhatia and Douglas R. Spitz and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Anna M. Button

38 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna M. Button United States 20 367 353 299 257 195 42 1.3k
R. de las Peñas Spain 15 438 1.2× 263 0.7× 330 1.1× 163 0.6× 174 0.9× 63 1.1k
Olivier Huillard France 20 540 1.5× 313 0.9× 311 1.0× 134 0.5× 141 0.7× 84 1.4k
José M. Pimiento United States 25 689 1.9× 174 0.5× 381 1.3× 740 2.9× 301 1.5× 126 1.8k
Gabriella Farina Italy 24 1.0k 2.8× 204 0.6× 293 1.0× 219 0.9× 217 1.1× 65 1.8k
Karen Mulder Canada 15 508 1.4× 393 1.1× 160 0.5× 282 1.1× 66 0.3× 47 1.1k
Ahmet Özet Türkiye 19 499 1.4× 135 0.4× 198 0.7× 144 0.6× 120 0.6× 153 1.3k
Inkeun Park South Korea 25 665 1.8× 341 1.0× 460 1.5× 464 1.8× 293 1.5× 107 1.7k
Keiichiro Nakamura Japan 28 606 1.7× 110 0.3× 495 1.7× 251 1.0× 299 1.5× 105 2.1k
Michael P. Chu Canada 21 570 1.6× 195 0.6× 308 1.0× 127 0.5× 64 0.3× 66 1.2k
A. Norman United Kingdom 19 1.0k 2.8× 491 1.4× 270 0.9× 873 3.4× 94 0.5× 42 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Button. The network helps show where Anna M. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M. Button

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M. Button. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M. Button based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M. Button. Anna M. Button is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
McDowell, Bradley D., et al.. (2016). Obesity is associated with increased risk of invasive penile cancer. BMC Urology. 16(1). 42–42. 27 indexed citations
3.
Du, Juan, John A. Cieslak, Jessemae L. Welsh, et al.. (2015). Pharmacological Ascorbate Radiosensitizes Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Research. 75(16). 3314–3326. 89 indexed citations
4.
O’Leary, Brianne R., Melissa A. Fath, Andrew M. Bellizzi, et al.. (2015). Loss of SOD3 (EcSOD) Expression Promotes an Aggressive Phenotype in Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 21(7). 1741–1751. 57 indexed citations
5.
Cieslak, John A., Juan Du, Claire M. Doskey, et al.. (2015). Manganoporphyrins and ascorbate enhance gemcitabine cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 83. 227–237. 31 indexed citations
6.
Goodheart, Michael J., Megan McDonald, Jean M. Hansen, et al.. (2015). Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 213(1). 49.e1–49.e8. 49 indexed citations
7.
8.
Hansen, Jean M., et al.. (2015). The effect of weight-based chemotherapy dosing in a cohort of gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecologic Oncology. 138(1). 154–158. 9 indexed citations
10.
McDowell, Bradley D., Cole G. Chapman, Bruce A. Smith, et al.. (2014). Pancreatectomy Predicts Improved Survival for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Annals of Surgery. 261(4). 740–745. 35 indexed citations
11.
Brachova, Pavla, Matthew J. Carlson, Michael J. Goodheart, et al.. (2014). TP53 oncomorphic mutations predict resistance to platinum- and taxane-based standard chemotherapy in patients diagnosed with advanced serous ovarian carcinoma. International Journal of Oncology. 46(2). 607–618. 59 indexed citations
12.
Leon‐Ferre, Roberto A., Boris G. Naraev, Shiliang Sun, et al.. (2014). Comparison of Transarterial Liver-Directed Therapies for Low-Grade Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in a Single Institution. Pancreas. 43(2). 219–225. 24 indexed citations
13.
Tennapel, M.J., Charles F. Lynch, Trudy L. Burns, et al.. (2014). SIRT6 Minor Allele Genotype Is Associated with >5-Year Decrease in Lifespan in an Aged Cohort. PLoS ONE. 9(12). e115616–e115616. 36 indexed citations
14.
Wagner, Brett A., Jessemae L. Welsh, Anna M. Button, et al.. (2013). Manganoporphyrins Increase Ascorbate-Induced Cytotoxicity by Enhancing H2O2 Generation. Cancer Research. 73(16). 5232–5241. 67 indexed citations
15.
Allen, Bryan G., Sudershan K. Bhatia, John M. Buatti, et al.. (2013). Ketogenic Diets Enhance Oxidative Stress and Radio-Chemo-Therapy Responses in Lung Cancer Xenografts. Clinical Cancer Research. 19(14). 3905–3913. 178 indexed citations
16.
Askeland, Ryan W., Xuefeng Zhang, Stephen M. Reed, et al.. (2013). RABL6A Promotes Oxaliplatin Resistance in Tumor Cells and Is a New Marker of Survival for Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients. Genes & Cancer. 4(7-8). 273–284. 22 indexed citations
17.
Harshman, Lyndsay A., S. Barron, Anna M. Button, et al.. (2012). Population-Based Exploration of Academic Achievement Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Survivors. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 37(4). 458–466. 19 indexed citations
18.
Clements, Aine, Dawne N. Shelton, Soohyung Park, et al.. (2011). Lymphoid Enhancing Factor 1 (Lef-1) overexpression in epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer and associations with clinical factors. 2(1). 1–2. 1 indexed citations
19.
Sinclair, Lynn, C Kenney, Anna M. Button, et al.. (2002). Complication rates after internal carotid stenting in high-risk, symptomatic patients. Stroke. 33. 345–346. 3 indexed citations
20.
Saqqur, Maher, Andrew M. Demchuk, Anna M. Button, et al.. (2002). Reversed ophthalmic artery flow is very specific for critical ICA stenosis or occlusion using power-M mode Doppler. Stroke. 33. 370–370. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026