Sarah Knight

667 total citations
39 papers, 385 citations indexed

About

Sarah Knight is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Knight has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 385 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Knight's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers). Sarah Knight is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers). Sarah Knight collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Sarah Knight's co-authors include Antje Heinrich, Nadine Lavan, Carolyn McGettigan, Eva Harris, Wei‐Kung Wang, Ángel Balmaseda, Yi-Chieh Wu, Chih-Yun Lai, Katherine L. Williams and Sven L. Mattys and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Psychological Science and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Knight

35 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Knight United Kingdom 12 196 90 67 52 46 39 385
Adrian Simpson United Kingdom 7 171 0.9× 29 0.3× 15 0.2× 67 1.3× 5 0.1× 10 597
Bettina Braun Germany 18 300 1.5× 682 7.6× 3 0.0× 25 0.5× 29 0.6× 87 1.0k
Dávid Farkas Hungary 11 162 0.8× 85 0.9× 12 0.2× 15 0.3× 30 404
Sandra Barrueco United States 9 238 1.2× 140 1.6× 5 0.1× 65 1.3× 3 0.1× 14 755
Christophe Lalanne France 9 204 1.0× 39 0.4× 2 0.0× 16 0.3× 68 1.5× 15 419
Miloš Stanković Serbia 9 56 0.3× 61 0.7× 15 0.2× 12 0.2× 24 309
Saho Takagi Japan 10 39 0.2× 60 0.7× 16 0.2× 4 0.1× 1 0.0× 30 299
Barry Leshowitz United States 12 298 1.5× 72 0.8× 84 1.3× 3 0.1× 37 425
C. Bredfeldt United States 10 335 1.7× 18 0.2× 2 0.0× 26 0.5× 15 0.3× 23 571
Seth Wiener United States 12 192 1.0× 247 2.7× 3 0.0× 5 0.1× 10 0.2× 40 425

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Knight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Knight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Knight. The network helps show where Sarah Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Knight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Knight. Sarah Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McGarrigle, Ronan, et al.. (2024). Mood shapes the impact of reward on perceived fatigue from listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 77(12). 2463–2475. 1 indexed citations
2.
Foster, Scott, et al.. (2023). Digital wellbeing – a review of the JISC guidance from the UK and Vietnam. Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning. 14(2). 435–442. 3 indexed citations
4.
Macey, Jake, Sarah Knight, Chris Marshall, et al.. (2022). PSAT097 Patient Preference Research: Preferred Adjunctive Medication Attributes of Adult Patients with Classic Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 6(Supplement_1). A118–A118. 1 indexed citations
5.
McGarrigle, Ronan, et al.. (2021). Older adults show a more sustained pattern of effortful listening than young adults.. Psychology and Aging. 36(4). 504–519. 19 indexed citations
6.
Eerola, Tuomas, Jamés O. Armitage, Nadine Lavan, & Sarah Knight. (2021). Online Data Collection in Auditory Perception and Cognition Research: Recruitment, Testing, Data Quality and Ethical Considerations. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 4(3-4). 251–280. 16 indexed citations
7.
Heinrich, Antje & Sarah Knight. (2020). Reproducibility in Cognitive Hearing Research: Theoretical Considerations and Their Practical Application in Multi-Lab Studies. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 1590–1590. 8 indexed citations
8.
Lavan, Nadine, et al.. (2019). Breaking voice identity perception: Expressive voices are more confusable for listeners. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72(9). 2240–2248. 29 indexed citations
9.
Lavan, Nadine, Sarah Knight, & Carolyn McGettigan. (2019). Listeners form average-based representations of individual voice identities. Nature Communications. 10(1). 2404–2404. 20 indexed citations
10.
Lavan, Nadine, Sarah Knight, Valérie Hazan, & Carolyn McGettigan. (2019). The effects of high variability training on voice identity learning. Cognition. 193. 104026–104026. 23 indexed citations
11.
Knight, Sarah & Antje Heinrich. (2019). Visual Inhibition Measures Predict Speech-in-Noise Perception Only in People With Low Levels of Education. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 2779–2779. 11 indexed citations
12.
Lavan, Nadine, et al.. (2019). ‘Please sort these voice recordings into 2 identities’: Effects of task instructions on performance in voice sorting studies. British Journal of Psychology. 111(3). 556–569. 13 indexed citations
13.
Knight, Sarah & Antje Heinrich. (2017). Different Measures of Auditory and Visual Stroop Interference and Their Relationship to Speech Intelligibility in Noise. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 230–230. 36 indexed citations
14.
Heinrich, Antje & Sarah Knight. (2016). The Contribution of Auditory and Cognitive Factors to Intelligibility of Words and Sentences in Noise. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 894. 37–45. 22 indexed citations
15.
Knight, Sarah, Neta Spiro, & Ian Cross. (2016). Look, listen and learn: Exploring effects of passive entrainment on social judgements of observed others. Psychology of Music. 45(1). 99–115. 11 indexed citations
16.
Hawkins, Sarah, et al.. (2015). Intelligibility of sung words In polytextual settings.. ICPhS. 1 indexed citations
17.
Knight, Sarah. (2015). The Life-Changing Magic of Not Giving a F*ck: How to Stop Spending Time You Don't Have with People You Don't Like Doing Things You Don't Want to Do.
18.
Lai, Chih-Yun, Katherine L. Williams, Yi-Chieh Wu, et al.. (2013). Analysis of Cross-Reactive Antibodies Recognizing the Fusion Loop of Envelope Protein and Correlation with Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Nicaraguan Dengue Cases. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 7(9). e2451–e2451. 54 indexed citations
19.
Knight, Sarah. (2012). 'Et spes et ratio studiorum in Caesare tantum' : Robert Burton and Patronage. Figshare. 1 indexed citations
20.
Knight, Sarah, et al.. (2006). Understanding the psychology of walkers with dogs: new approaches to better management. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026