Sarah Kingston
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Epidemiology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Natalie HammondTerry ThomasKate HardyColin WebsterNicola SmithAmy ElliottKevin StensonNicola Madge
- Topics
- Sex work and related issues (13 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMoldova
In The Last Decade
Sarah Kingston
20 papers receiving 196 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Sociology and Political Science 183
- Clinical Psychology 100
- Gender Studies 84
- Epidemiology 54
- General Health Professions 26
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Kingston
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Kingston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Kingston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Kingston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Kingston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Kingston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Kingston. The network helps show where Sarah Kingston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Kingston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Kingston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Kingston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Kingston. Sarah Kingston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Women Who Buy Sex: Converging Sexualities? | 3 |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Poverty and Crime Review | 2 |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | Anti-Poverty Strategies for the UK: Poverty and Crime Review | 8 |
| 18 | Prostitution in the Community: Attitudes, Action and Resistance | 18 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | Demonising desire: men who buy sex and prostitution policy in the UK | 1 |
About Sarah Kingston
Sarah Kingston is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (13 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (84 citations), Clinical Psychology (100 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (183 citations). Sarah Kingston has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Moldova. Frequent co-authors include Natalie Hammond, Terry Thomas, Kate Hardy, Colin Webster, Nicola Smith, Amy Elliott, Kevin Stenson, Nicola Madge, Peter Hemming and Louis Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, The British Journal of Criminology and Qualitative Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.