Sarah Keyes

404 citations
16 papers · 287 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Keyes

13 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Sarah Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • General Health Professions 134
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 64
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
  • Environmental Engineering 40
  • Conservation 9
Replace Marjolein Elings with:
Marjolein Elings United Kingdom
Michail Georgiou United Kingdom
Carrie Draper United States
Marianne V. Santoso United States
Telma C. Almeida Portugal
Naomi A. Sachs United States
Cathal T. Gallagher United Kingdom
Sylvie Jutras Canada
Jo Barnes South Africa
Alec M. Chan‐Golston United States
Sarah Keyes relative to Marjolein Elings United Kingdom Marjolein Elings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Marjolein Elings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Keyes. The network helps show where Sarah Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Keyes Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201479
2 201577
3 201120
4
Healthbridge: The National Evaluation of Peer Support Networks and Dementia Advisers in implementation of the National Dementia Strategy for England
201320
5 201520
6 201815
7 201814
8 201513
9 201410
10 20168
11 20235
12 20094
13 20232
14 20160
15 20200
16 20190

About Sarah Keyes

Sarah Keyes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Clinical Psychology, Marketing and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 16 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (134 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (64 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations), Environmental Engineering (40 citations) and Conservation (9 citations). Sarah Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Karen Beazley, Peter Tyedmers, Charlotte Clarke, Jane Wilcockson, Heather Wilkinson, Louise Robinson, Mima Cattan, Lynne Corner, Joanna Reynolds and Catherine E. Gibb. Their work appears in journals such as Dementia, Journal of American History, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, Environmental History and Ageing and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact