Julie Watson

615 total citations
22 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Julie Watson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Watson has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Julie Watson's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers). Julie Watson is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers). Julie Watson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Julie Watson's co-authors include Jo Hockley, Belinda Dewar, Scott A Murray, David Oxenham, William McGuire, Charlotte Clarke, Heather Wilkinson, Toby Williamson, Jane Wilcockson and Graciela Muñiz‐Terrera and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Age and Ageing and Qualitative Health Research.

In The Last Decade

Julie Watson

22 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julie Watson United Kingdom 11 282 266 89 84 61 22 449
Elena Mariani Italy 11 237 0.8× 279 1.0× 85 1.0× 49 0.6× 60 1.0× 20 385
Elizabeth A. Luth United States 12 234 0.8× 363 1.4× 172 1.9× 52 0.6× 78 1.3× 42 477
Berit Seiger Cronfalk Sweden 11 160 0.6× 106 0.4× 66 0.7× 65 0.8× 21 0.3× 20 315
Sarah Forbes-Thompson United States 9 256 0.9× 190 0.7× 67 0.8× 60 0.7× 79 1.3× 10 364
Jean Kozak Canada 10 227 0.8× 213 0.8× 122 1.4× 156 1.9× 11 0.2× 19 499
Taeko Nakashima Japan 13 265 0.9× 197 0.7× 76 0.9× 167 2.0× 25 0.4× 24 418
Jean Munn United States 14 382 1.4× 386 1.5× 230 2.6× 113 1.3× 49 0.8× 24 662
Kenneth J. Branco United States 7 289 1.0× 132 0.5× 89 1.0× 128 1.5× 42 0.7× 10 407
J. Rocafort Spain 9 196 0.7× 356 1.3× 154 1.7× 34 0.4× 46 0.8× 14 496
Chris Shiels United Kingdom 11 187 0.7× 150 0.6× 78 0.9× 49 0.6× 33 0.5× 16 457

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Watson. The network helps show where Julie Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Watson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Watson. Julie Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Craven, B. Catharine, et al.. (2024). Parkwood's VIP4SCI platform: A virtual e-health self-management solution for persons with spinal cord injury across the care continuum. Digital Health. 10. 599916330–599916330. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hockley, Jo, et al.. (2024). Practicalities of promoting practice‐based learning in end of life care for care home staff: Lessons from “online” supportive conversations and reflection sessions. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 19(1). e12598–e12598. 1 indexed citations
3.
Watson, Julie, Jane Wilcockson, Sarah Keyes, et al.. (2023). ‘I feel more part of the world’: Participatory action research to develop post-diagnostic dementia support. Dementia. 22(7). 1420–1439. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hockley, Jo, et al.. (2022). Online Supportive Conversations and Reflection Sessions (OSCaRS): A Feasibility Pilot with Care Home Staff during the Pandemic. Edinburgh Research Explorer. 10(1). 48–58. 2 indexed citations
5.
Thomas, Mary & Julie Watson. (2020). Caregivers of Stroke Survivors’ Perspectives on Stressful Caregiver Activities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 74(4_Supplement_1). 7411510270p1–7411510270p1. 3 indexed citations
6.
Watson, Julie, Graciela Muñiz‐Terrera, Craig Ritchie, et al.. (2019). What matters to people with memory problems, healthy volunteers and health and social care professionals in the context of developing treatment to prevent Alzheimer's dementia? A qualitative study. Health Expectations. 22(3). 504–517. 17 indexed citations
7.
Clarke, Charlotte, Jane Wilcockson, Julie Watson, et al.. (2018). Relational care and co-operative endeavour – Reshaping dementia care through participatory secondary data analysis. Dementia. 19(4). 1151–1172. 14 indexed citations
8.
Muñiz‐Terrera, Graciela, Julie Watson, Charlotte Clarke, et al.. (2018). Participant outcomes and preferences in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: The electronic Person‐Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) development program. Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. 4(1). 694–702. 13 indexed citations
9.
Clarke, Charlotte, et al.. (2018). A Seat Around the Table: Participatory Data Analysis With People Living With Dementia. Qualitative Health Research. 28(9). 1421–1433. 30 indexed citations
11.
Hockley, Jo, et al.. (2016). Fixing the broken image of care homes, could a ‘care home innovation centre’ be the answer?. Age and Ageing. 46(2). 175–178. 8 indexed citations
12.
Robertson, Kate, et al.. (2012). Thinking falls – taking action: a falls prevention tool for care homes. British Journal of Community Nursing. 17(5). 206–209. 10 indexed citations
13.
Hockley, Jo, Julie Watson, David Oxenham, & Scott A Murray. (2010). The integrated implementation of two end-of-life care tools in nursing care homes in the UK: an in-depth evaluation. Palliative Medicine. 24(8). 828–838. 100 indexed citations
14.
Watson, Julie, et al.. (2010). Evaluating effectiveness of the GSFCH and LCP in care homes. 4(3). 42–49. 21 indexed citations
15.
Cooper, Lesley, et al.. (2008). Open all hours: a qualitative exploration of open visiting in a hospice. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 14(7). 334–341. 2 indexed citations
16.
Watson, Julie. (2008). "I have a headache"!. PubMed. 71(9). 34–9; quiz 40. 6 indexed citations
17.
Watson, Julie, Jo Hockley, & Belinda Dewar. (2006). Barriers to implementing an integrated care pathway for the last days of life in nursing homes. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 12(5). 234–240. 79 indexed citations
18.
Bowes, Jennifer, et al.. (2003). Families and childcare arrangements: findings from the Child Care Choices Study.. 81–86. 2 indexed citations
19.
Watson, Julie, et al.. (2000). Brief Communication. The Forest Healthcare Clinical Support Librarian: 6 months on. Health Libraries Review. 17(4). 219–221. 5 indexed citations
20.
Watson, Julie, et al.. (2000). Brief Communication. Health Libraries Review. 17(4). 219–221. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026