Sarah Hamilton‐Wright

831 citations
22 papers · 575 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Hamilton‐Wright

21 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Sarah Hamilton‐Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Health 235
  • General Health Professions 317
  • Clinical Psychology 243
  • Sociology and Political Science 190
  • Gender Studies 39
Replace Michael R. Duke with:
Michael R. Duke United States
Gabriel L. Schwartz United States
Sonia Panadero Spain
Pajarita Charles United States
Angela M. Moe United States
Sten‐Åke Stenberg Sweden
Erin Pearson United States
Kyoung Hag Lee United States
Giulia Ferrari United Kingdom
Amber Clough United States
Sarah Hamilton‐Wright relative to Michael R. Duke United States Michael R. Duke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael R. Duke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Hamilton‐Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Hamilton‐Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Hamilton‐Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Hamilton‐Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Hamilton‐Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Hamilton‐Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Hamilton‐Wright. The network helps show where Sarah Hamilton‐Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Hamilton‐Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Hamilton‐Wright Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Hamilton‐Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 20220
3 20222
4 202113
5 20212
6 20212
7 202029
8 20196
9 201924
10 201827
11 201813
12 20178
13 201618
14 201634
15 201615
16 201680
17 2015119
18 201581
19 201545
20 201323

About Sarah Hamilton‐Wright

Sarah Hamilton‐Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Clinical Psychology, Demography and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (17 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (10 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (235 citations), General Health Professions (317 citations), Clinical Psychology (243 citations), Sociology and Political Science (190 citations) and Gender Studies (39 citations). Sarah Hamilton‐Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Flora I. Matheson, Nihaya Daoud, Patricia O’Campo, Cheryl Pedersen, Julia Woodhall‐Melnik, Sara J. T. Guilcher, James R. Dunn, Anita Minh, Carolyn Ziegler and Stephen W. Hwang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE, Housing Studies, Journal of Gambling Studies and Women s Health Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026