Sarah Carmichael
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Gender Politics and Representation
- Demography top 5%
- Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Family Dynamics and Relationships
Papers in
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 5
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences 4
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Auke Rijpma (7 shared papers)Selin Dilli (6 shared papers)Jan Luiten van Zanden (4 shared papers)Tine De Moor (3 shared papers)Claude Diebolt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The History of the Family (2 papers)Feminist Economics (1 paper)CESifo Economic Studies (1 paper)Cross-Cultural Research (1 paper)The Journal of Economic History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsRussiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sarah Carmichael
12 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Gender Studies 132
- Demography 115
- Economics and Econometrics 103
- History 31
- Sociology and Political Science 114
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Carmichael
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Carmichael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Carmichael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Carmichael more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Carmichael
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Carmichael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Carmichael. The network helps show where Sarah Carmichael may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Carmichael, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 8 | Capital Women: The European Marriage Pattern, Female Empowerment and Economic Development in Western Europe 1300-1800 | 2019 | 12 |
| 9 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 12 | Women in global economic history | 2016 | 1 |
About Sarah Carmichael
Sarah Carmichael is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Demography, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (1 paper) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (132 citations), Demography (115 citations), Economics and Econometrics (103 citations), History (31 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (114 citations). Sarah Carmichael has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Auke Rijpma, Selin Dilli, Jan Luiten van Zanden, Tine De Moor and Claude Diebolt. Their work appears in journals such as The History of the Family, Feminist Economics, CESifo Economic Studies, Cross-Cultural Research and The Journal of Economic History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.