Sara Rızvı Jafree
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Qaisar Khalid MahmoodFlorian FischerRubeena ZakarMuhammad Zakria ZakarMalik Muhammad SohailJane BarlowSyed Asghar NaqiAisha Jalil
- Topics
- Global Maternal and Child Health (9 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (8 papers)Healthcare Systems and Reforms (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFrontiers in PsychologyBMC Public Health
- Partner nations
- PakistanGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sara Rızvı Jafree
40 papers receiving 470 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 161
- Sociology and Political Science 140
- General Health Professions 127
- Health 66
- Economics and Econometrics 60
Countries citing papers authored by Sara Rızvı Jafree
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Rızvı Jafree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Rızvı Jafree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Rızvı Jafree more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Rızvı Jafree
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Rızvı Jafree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Rızvı Jafree. The network helps show where Sara Rızvı Jafree may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Rızvı Jafree
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Rızvı Jafree. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Rızvı Jafree based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Rızvı Jafree. Sara Rızvı Jafree is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 65 |
About Sara Rızvı Jafree
Sara Rızvı Jafree is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Health Information Management, having authored 47 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (9 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (8 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Reforms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (10 citations), Health (66 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (40 citations). Sara Rızvı Jafree has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Qaisar Khalid Mahmood, Florian Fischer, Rubeena Zakar, Muhammad Zakria Zakar, Malik Muhammad Sohail, Jane Barlow, Syed Asghar Naqi, Aisha Jalil, Amina Muazzam and Muhammad Asim. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.