Sara MacBride‐Stewart
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Myfanwy DaviesMichael ShepherdGiles GreeneSamia AddisVictoria M. GraceYi GongKirsty WildAlistair Woodward
- Topics
- Urban Green Space and Health (5 papers)Urban Transport and Accessibility (3 papers)Education, Leadership, and Health Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Sara MacBride‐Stewart
20 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Social Psychology 154
- Sociology and Political Science 103
- General Health Professions 70
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 69
- Reproductive Medicine 57
Countries citing papers authored by Sara MacBride‐Stewart
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara MacBride‐Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara MacBride‐Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara MacBride‐Stewart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara MacBride‐Stewart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara MacBride‐Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara MacBride‐Stewart. The network helps show where Sara MacBride‐Stewart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara MacBride‐Stewart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara MacBride‐Stewart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara MacBride‐Stewart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara MacBride‐Stewart. Sara MacBride‐Stewart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 168 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Sara MacBride‐Stewart
Sara MacBride‐Stewart is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Transportation and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 20 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Green Space and Health (5 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (3 papers) and Education, Leadership, and Health Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (52 citations), Social Psychology (154 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (57 citations). Sara MacBride‐Stewart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Myfanwy Davies, Michael Shepherd, Giles Greene, Samia Addis, Victoria M. Grace, Yi Gong, Kirsty Wild, Alistair Woodward, Marie Russell and Michael Keall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Sustainability and Geoforum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.