Giles Greene
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 8
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
- Nursing Roles and Practices 2
- Global Health Care Issues 2
- Health 8
- Health disparities and outcomes 8
- Co-authors
- Shantini Paranjothy (8 shared papers)Myfanwy Davies (1 shared paper)Samia Addis (1 shared paper)Sara MacBride‐Stewart (1 shared paper)Michael Shepherd (1 shared paper)James White (6 shared papers)David Fone (7 shared papers)Stephen Palmer (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Occupational Medicine (2 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)British Journal of General Practice (2 papers)Addictive Behaviors (1 paper)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Giles Greene
34 papers receiving 807 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Health 146
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 27
- General Health Professions 292
- Social Psychology 204
- Clinical Psychology 136
Countries citing papers authored by Giles Greene
This map shows the geographic impact of Giles Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles Greene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giles Greene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles Greene. The network helps show where Giles Greene may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giles Greene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 168 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 13 |
About Giles Greene
Giles Greene is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (146 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (27 citations), General Health Professions (292 citations), Social Psychology (204 citations) and Clinical Psychology (136 citations). Giles Greene has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Shantini Paranjothy, Myfanwy Davies, Samia Addis, Sara MacBride‐Stewart, Michael Shepherd, James White, David Fone, Stephen Palmer, Daniel Farewell and Debbie L. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Occupational Medicine, BMJ Open, British Journal of General Practice, Addictive Behaviors and Health Technology Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.