Giles Greene
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 5
- Health, psychology, and well-being 2
- Health 5
- Health disparities and outcomes 5
- Co-authors
- Shantini Paranjothy (8 shared papers)Michael Shepherd (1 shared paper)Myfanwy Davies (1 shared paper)Sara MacBride‐Stewart (1 shared paper)Samia Addis (1 shared paper)James White (7 shared papers)Stephen Palmer (3 shared papers)David Fone (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (2 papers)British Journal of General Practice (2 papers)The Lancet (2 papers)Occupational Medicine (2 papers)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHong KongBelgium
In The Last Decade
Giles Greene
34 papers receiving 832 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 28
- Health 91
- General Health Professions 197
- Social Psychology 165
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Giles Greene
This map shows the geographic impact of Giles Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles Greene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giles Greene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles Greene. The network helps show where Giles Greene may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giles Greene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 168 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 13 |
About Giles Greene
Giles Greene is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (3 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (2 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (28 citations), Health (91 citations), General Health Professions (197 citations), Social Psychology (165 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations). Giles Greene has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Shantini Paranjothy, Michael Shepherd, Myfanwy Davies, Sara MacBride‐Stewart, Samia Addis, James White, Stephen Palmer, David Fone, Daniel Farewell and Debbie L. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, British Journal of General Practice, The Lancet, Occupational Medicine and Health Technology Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.