Sara Lima
About
In The Last Decade
Sara Lima
14 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Sociology and Political Science 199
- Clinical Psychology 103
- Social Psychology 98
- Mechanical Engineering 96
- Metals and Alloys 79
Countries citing papers authored by Sara Lima
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Lima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Lima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Lima more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Lima
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Lima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Lima. The network helps show where Sara Lima may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Lima
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Lima. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Lima based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Lima. Sara Lima is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 177 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 73 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 125 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.