Sara F. Wright
- Soil Science top 0.5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 13
- Soil erosion and sediment transport 3
- Insect Science top 1%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 5
- Plant Science top 1%
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 15
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis 5
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 3
-
- Fungal Biology and Applications 3
-
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems 2
- Co-authors
- Abha UpadhyayaMatthias C. RilligCatherine E. LovelockValerie T. EvinerKristine A. NicholsWalter SchmidtMargaret TornChristopher B. Field
- Journals
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (4 papers)Soil Biology and Biochemistry (3 papers)Plant and Soil (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaMexico
In The Last Decade
Sara F. Wright
25 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Soil Science 1.4k
- Insect Science 722
- Plant Science 2.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 342
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 469
Countries citing papers authored by Sara F. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara F. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara F. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara F. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara F. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara F. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara F. Wright. The network helps show where Sara F. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara F. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 172 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 96 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 225 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 102 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 169 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 410 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 476 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 72 | |
| 12 | EXTRACTION OF AN ABUNDANT AND UNUSUAL PROTEIN FROM SOIL AND COMPARISON WITH HYPHAL PROTEIN OF ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGIbreakdown → | 1996 | 775 |
| 13 | 1989 | 30 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 32 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 6 |
About Sara F. Wright
Sara F. Wright is a scholar working on Soil Science, Plant Science and Insect Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (15 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (13 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (5 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (3 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (1.4k citations), Insect Science (722 citations) and Plant Science (2.1k citations). Sara F. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Abha Upadhyaya, Matthias C. Rillig, Catherine E. Lovelock, Valerie T. Eviner, Kristine A. Nichols, Walter Schmidt, Margaret Torn, Christopher B. Field, Roger W. Ruess and Deborah A. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Plant and Soil, Soil Science and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.