Murray J. Favus
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 0.05%
- Bone health and osteoporosis research 32
- Bone and Joint Diseases 10
- Nephrology top 0.5%
- Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments 36
- Renal function and acid-base balance 12
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Bone health and treatments 15
- Complementary and Manual Therapy top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Vitamin D Research Studies 43
-
- Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments 17
-
- Ion Transport and Channel Regulation 12
- Co-authors
- F. L. CoeDavid A. BushinskyDavid M. SlovikJon R. DavidsRobert LindsayBess Dawson‐HughesSundeep KhoslaRobert W. Downs
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (3 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Investigation (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Murray J. Favus
128 papers receiving 8.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 4.2k
- Nephrology 1.3k
- Oncology 3.0k
- Complementary and Manual Therapy 190
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Murray J. Favus
This map shows the geographic impact of Murray J. Favus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Murray J. Favus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Murray J. Favus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Murray J. Favus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Murray J. Favus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Murray J. Favus. The network helps show where Murray J. Favus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Murray J. Favus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Groupbreakdown → | 2014 | 438 |
| 2 | 2013 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 339 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 70 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 101 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 77 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 62 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 146 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 76 |
About Murray J. Favus
Murray J. Favus is a scholar working on Nephrology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 128 papers that have together received 9.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin D Research Studies (43 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (36 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (32 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (17 papers), Bone health and treatments (15 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (12 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (12 papers) and Bone and Joint Diseases (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (4.2k citations), Nephrology (1.3k citations) and Oncology (3.0k citations). Murray J. Favus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include F. L. Coe, David A. Bushinsky, David M. Slovik, Jon R. Davids, Robert Lindsay, Bess Dawson‐Hughes, Sundeep Khosla, Robert W. Downs, Norman H. Bell and Arthur C. Santora. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.