Murray J. Favus
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 0.05%
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Surgery top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- F. L. CoeDavid A. BushinskyDavid M. SlovikJon R. DavidsRobert LindsayBess Dawson‐HughesSundeep KhoslaRobert W. Downs
- Topics
- Vitamin D Research Studies (43 papers)Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (36 papers)Bone health and osteoporosis research (32 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical Investigation
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Murray J. Favus
128 papers receiving 8.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 4.2k
- Oncology 3.0k
- Molecular Biology 2.2k
- Surgery 1.7k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Murray J. Favus
This map shows the geographic impact of Murray J. Favus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Murray J. Favus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Murray J. Favus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Murray J. Favus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Murray J. Favus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Murray J. Favus. The network helps show where Murray J. Favus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Murray J. Favus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Murray J. Favus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Murray J. Favus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Murray J. Favus. Murray J. Favus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Groupbreakdown → | 438 |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | 339 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 70 | |
| 10 | 101 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 77 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 146 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 76 |
About Murray J. Favus
Murray J. Favus is a scholar working on Nephrology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 128 papers that have together received 9.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin D Research Studies (43 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (36 papers) and Bone health and osteoporosis research (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (4.2k citations), Nephrology (1.3k citations) and Oncology (3.0k citations). Murray J. Favus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include F. L. Coe, David A. Bushinsky, David M. Slovik, Jon R. Davids, Robert Lindsay, Bess Dawson‐Hughes, Sundeep Khosla, Robert W. Downs, Norman H. Bell and Arthur C. Santora. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.