Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Harris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Harris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Harris more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Harris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Harris. The network helps show where Sandra Harris may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Harris
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Harris.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Harris based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Harris. Sandra Harris is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harris, Sandra, et al.. (2011). An Investigation into the Life Experiences and Beliefs of Teachers Exhibiting Highly Effective Classroom Management Behaviors.. Teacher education & practice. 24(1). 96–113.3 indexed citations
Jackson, Sandra & Sandra Harris. (2007). African American Female College and University Presidents: Experiences and Perceptions of Barriers to the Presidency.. Insecta mundi. 5(2). 119–137.9 indexed citations
6.
Harris, Sandra. (2006). Best Practices of Award-Winning Public School Principals: Implications for University Preparation Programs.. 3(2). 30–41.3 indexed citations
7.
Harris, Sandra. (2006). Changing Leadership Paradigms and Practices of Doctoral Students.. 2(4). 5–11.2 indexed citations
8.
Harris, Sandra, et al.. (2006). Texas Superintendents' Ratings of Standards/Assessment/Accountability Programs.. Planning and changing. 37. 190–204.2 indexed citations
9.
Schilling, Robert & Sandra Harris. (2005). Fundamentals of digital signal processing using MATLAB. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).32 indexed citations
10.
Harris, Sandra, et al.. (2004). Superintendent Perceptions of Motivators and Inhibitors for the Superintendency.. Planning and changing. 35. 108–126.8 indexed citations
11.
Harris, Sandra, et al.. (2003). Keeping Bullies at Bay.. The American school board journal. 190(11). 43–45.1 indexed citations
12.
Harris, Sandra, et al.. (2002). A View from the Classroom.. Educational leadership. 59(8). 64–65.11 indexed citations
Harris, Sandra, et al.. (1999). Applied Numerical Methods for Engineers Using MATLAB.18 indexed citations
15.
Katims, David S. & Sandra Harris. (1997). Improving the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students in Inclusive Classrooms.. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 41(2).32 indexed citations
Harris, Sandra & Jan S. Handleman. (1990). Aversive and nonaversive interventions : controlling life-threatening behavior by the developmentally disabled. Springer eBooks.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.