Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Tennyson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Tennyson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Tennyson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Tennyson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Tennyson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Tennyson. The network helps show where Samuel Tennyson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samuel Tennyson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samuel Tennyson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samuel Tennyson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Samuel Tennyson. Samuel Tennyson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Arivoli, Subramanian, et al.. (2020). ASSESSMENT OF SOIL AND WATER QUALITY AND ITS POSSIBLE IMPACT ON THE FLORA AND FAUNA IN JAYARAMPETTAI VILLAGE OF RANIPET DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU, INDIA. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 62–71.1 indexed citations
5.
Arivoli, Subramanian, et al.. (2020). Surveillance of the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus Skuse 1894 (Diptera: Culicidae) the dengue vector in rubber plantations of Kanya Kumari district, Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Mosquito Research. 7(4). 127–136.1 indexed citations
6.
Sakthivadivel, Murugesan, et al.. (2019). Smoke repellency effect of Wrightia tinctoria (Roxb.) R.Br. (Apocynaceae) on mosquitoes. International Journal of Mosquito Research. 6(6). 124–129.1 indexed citations
7.
Arivoli, Subramanian, et al.. (2019). Biocontrol efficiency of Nepa cinerea Linnaeus 1758 (Hemiptera: Nepidae) against the vectors of dengue and filarial fever. International Journal of Mosquito Research. 6(6). 39–42.3 indexed citations
8.
Arivoli, Subramanian, et al.. (2019). GC-MS analysis of bioactive compounds of Curcuma longa Linnaeus (Zingiberaceae) rhizome extract. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 8(6). 49–52.8 indexed citations
9.
Tennyson, Samuel, et al.. (2018). Analysis of physicochemical water quality parameters of Buckingham Canal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3(1). 226–231.3 indexed citations
10.
Arivoli, Subramanian, et al.. (2018). Molluscan biodiversity (phytal fauna) of Thondi coast in Palk Bay, Southeast coast of India. 3(1). 145–153.1 indexed citations
11.
Tennyson, Samuel, et al.. (2018). Bioefficacy of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don (Apocyanaceae) and Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit (Lamiaceae) ethanolic aerial extracts on the larval instars of the dengue and chikungunya vector Aedes aegypti Linnaeus 1762 (Diptera: Culicidae). International Journal of Mosquito Research. 5(4). 7–18.3 indexed citations
12.
Tennyson, Samuel, et al.. (2017). Laboratory evaluation of a few plant extracts for their ovicidal, larvicidal and pupicidal activity against medically important human dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus vector, Aedes aegypti Linnaeus 1762 (Diptera: Culicidae). International Journal of Mosquito Research. 4(4). 17–28.9 indexed citations
13.
Jayakumar, M., et al.. (2017). Repellent activity and fumigant toxicity of a few plant oils against the adult rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae Linnaeus 1763 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5(2). 324–335.39 indexed citations
14.
Sakthivadivel, Murugesan, et al.. (2016). Laboratory evaluation of Asteraceae species Tagetes erecta Linnaeus and Tridax procumbens Linnaeus for their toxicity against the larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say 1823 (Diptera: Culicidae). International Journal of Mosquito Research. 3(3). 35–46.4 indexed citations
15.
Arivoli, Subramanian, Samuel Tennyson, M. Jayakumar, et al.. (2016). Larvicidal activity of fractions of Sphaeranthus indicus Linnaeus (Asteraceae) ethyl acetate whole plant extract against Aedes aegypti Linnaeus 1762, Anopheles stephensi Liston 1901 and Culex quinquefasciatus Say 1823 (Diptera: Culicidae). International Journal of Mosquito Research. 3(2). 18–30.9 indexed citations
16.
Tennyson, Samuel, et al.. (2015). Ovicidal and repellent activities of Cereus hildmannianus (K. Schum.) (Cactaceae) extracts against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). International Journal of Mosquito Research. 2(1). 13–17.5 indexed citations
17.
Sakthivadivel, Murugesan, et al.. (2015). Mosquito larvicidal activity of Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit (Lamiaceae) aerial extracts against the filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies. 3(4). 1–5.8 indexed citations
18.
Arivoli, Subramanian, et al.. (2014). Larvicidal activity of Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae) flower extracts against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). International Journal of Mosquito Research. 1(1). 38–42.36 indexed citations
19.
Sakthivadivel, Murugesan, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of Solanum trilobatum L. (Solanaceae) aerial extracts for mosquito larvicidal activity against the filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2(6). 102–106.2 indexed citations
20.
Tennyson, Samuel, et al.. (2013). Screening of Plant Extracts for Oviposition Activity against Spodoptera Litura (Fab). (Lepidoptera: Noctiduae. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies. 1(1). 20–24.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.