Samuel Lebens
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Religious studies top 5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Papers in
- Philosophy 30
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 23
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 9
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 4
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 13
Samuel Lebens
26 papers receiving 94 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Philosophy 77
- Religious studies 32
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 23
- History and Philosophy of Science 7
- Health 9
Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Lebens
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Lebens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Lebens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Lebens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Lebens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Lebens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Lebens. The network helps show where Samuel Lebens may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Samuel Lebens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 11 | The Promise of a New Past | 2017 | 3 |
| 12 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 17 | Bertrand Russell and the Nature of Propositions: A History and Defence of the Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement | 2017 | 2 |
| 18 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 1 |
About Samuel Lebens
Samuel Lebens is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 106 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (23 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (9 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (4 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (77 citations), Religious studies (32 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (23 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (7 citations) and Health (9 citations). Samuel Lebens has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Statman and Aaron Segal. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Philosophia and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.