Samuel E. Lacey

807 total citations
9 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Samuel E. Lacey is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Samuel E. Lacey has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Cell Biology and 3 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Samuel E. Lacey's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (6 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (5 papers) and Micro and Nano Robotics (3 papers). Samuel E. Lacey is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (6 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (5 papers) and Micro and Nano Robotics (3 papers). Samuel E. Lacey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Samuel E. Lacey's co-authors include Andrew P. Carter, Gaia Pigino, Nadia Bahi‐Buisson, Helen E. Foster, Alexander W. Bird, Kai Zhang, Arnaud Rondelet, Helen Foster, Sjors H. W. Scheres and Shaoda He and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Cell and Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Samuel E. Lacey

9 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Samuel E. Lacey United Kingdom	8	305	294	101	38	28	9	424
Mohamed M. Elshenawy United States	11	399 1.3×	290 1.0×	108 1.1×	33 0.9×	36 1.3×	11	535
Helen E. Foster United Kingdom	4	258 0.8×	288 1.0×	37 0.4×	31 0.8×	27 1.0×	4	359
Shun Kai Yang Canada	7	168 0.6×	125 0.4×	88 0.9×	41 1.1×	23 0.8×	9	287
Zaw Min Htet United States	9	327 1.1×	350 1.2×	38 0.4×	19 0.5×	34 1.2×	14	470
Shintaroh Kubo Japan	9	272 0.9×	142 0.5×	95 0.9×	53 1.4×	31 1.1×	25	410
Clinton K. Lau United Kingdom	7	220 0.7×	225 0.8×	44 0.4×	18 0.5×	25 0.9×	11	435
Carol Cho United States	8	501 1.6×	501 1.7×	85 0.8×	37 1.0×	20 0.7×	13	705
Corbin Black Canada	9	183 0.6×	111 0.4×	92 0.9×	27 0.7×	26 0.9×	17	303
Marine H. Laporte Switzerland	14	299 1.0×	234 0.8×	113 1.1×	54 1.4×	38 1.4×	20	495
Gonzalo Alvarez Viar Italy	5	239 0.8×	145 0.5×	197 2.0×	23 0.6×	13 0.5×	8	348

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel E. Lacey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel E. Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel E. Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel E. Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel E. Lacey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel E. Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel E. Lacey. The network helps show where Samuel E. Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samuel E. Lacey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samuel E. Lacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samuel E. Lacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Samuel E. Lacey. Samuel E. Lacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Lacey, Samuel E. & Gaia Pigino. (2024). The intraflagellar transport cycle. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 26(3). 175–192. 18 indexed citations

2.

Lacey, Samuel E., Andrea Graziadei, & Gaia Pigino. (2024). Extensive structural rearrangement of intraflagellar transport trains underpins bidirectional cargo transport. Cell. 187(17). 4621–4636.e18. 10 indexed citations

3.

Lacey, Samuel E., Helen Foster, & Gaia Pigino. (2023). The molecular structure of IFT-A and IFT-B in anterograde intraflagellar transport trains. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 30(5). 584–593. 53 indexed citations

4.

Tan, Ruensern, Lenka Libusová, Samuel E. Lacey, et al.. (2022). Microtubule lattice spacing governs cohesive envelope formation of tau family proteins. Nature Chemical Biology. 18(11). 1224–1235. 41 indexed citations

5.

Lau, Clinton K., Francis J. O’Reilly, Balaji Santhanam, et al.. (2021). Cryo‐EM reveals the complex architecture of dynactin's shoulder region and pointed end. The EMBO Journal. 40(8). e106164–e106164. 21 indexed citations

6.

Lacey, Samuel E., et al.. (2019). Dynein's Directionality is Controlled by the Angle and Length of its Stalk. Biophysical Journal. 116(3). 309a–309a. 1 indexed citations

7.

Lacey, Samuel E., et al.. (2019). Directionality of dynein is controlled by the angle and length of its stalk. Nature. 566(7744). 407–410. 43 indexed citations

8.

Lacey, Samuel E., Shaoda He, Sjors H. W. Scheres, & Andrew P. Carter. (2019). Cryo-EM of dynein microtubule-binding domains shows how an axonemal dynein distorts the microtubule. eLife. 8. 50 indexed citations

9.

Zhang, Kai, Helen E. Foster, Arnaud Rondelet, et al.. (2017). Cryo-EM Reveals How Human Cytoplasmic Dynein Is Auto-inhibited and Activated. Cell. 169(7). 1303–1314.e18. 187 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact